A Most Hyperdimensional Eclipse …
Final Venus Transit
By Richard C. Hoagland
© 2012 The Enterprise Mission
On Sunday, May 20, 2012, the first annular solar eclipse
visible in the continental United States for 18 years -- after crossing
the entire Pacific Ocean, and then, the North American coastline at the
Oregon/California boundary -- ends at sunset in the “Great American
Southwest” … just east of Lubbock, Texas.
Albuquerque, New Mexico – home of The Enterprise
Mission -- will be exactly in line with the eclipse path of “maximum
annularity” (image – above) – allowing an unprecedented
opportunity for both spectacular visual observations, as well as a unique
“field test” of its long-controversial “Hyperdimensional/Torsion
Physics” Model – first televised nationally in November, 2010,
in NBC/SyFy’s “2012: Startling New Secrets.”
Based on decades of theoretical and experimental research,
by scores of physicists around the world, and dozens of globally-spanning
field tests carried out by The Enterprise Mission itself, on
May 20th Enterprise will be testing LIVE for the first time –
during this “annular solar eclipse” -- the core concept of
the entire “Hyperdimensional/Torsion Field Model”:
That, geometric alignments -- of ROTATING planetary/stellar objects --
are crucial in creating scientifically observable changes in
the underlying “torsion field Physics” … across the
entire solar system … and, during solar eclipses, are capable of
affecting a wide range of diverse phenomenon across this entire planet
– ranging from altering actual “physical constants”
… to altering “geophysical and meteorological phenomenon”
... to dramatically affecting biology... and even “consciousness”
The Enterprise Mission plans to televise – via an Internet
“livestream” webcast on May 20th (details to be posted shortly
here …) – the real-time acquisition of this unprecedented
HD/Torsion solar eclipse data. During this dramatic telecast, in addition
to the LIVE “Enterprise Accutron measurements” of
the eclipse, the much broader technological, sociological and historical
implications of these data – from the availability of “free
energy,” to the feasibility of “anti-gravity” …
to the accumulating evidence that “a Prior, High-Tech Civilization”
USED this same HD Physics and Technology thousands of years ago to construct
“ancient, sacred sites” around the world -- will also be presented
What these eclipse observations mean for a follow-on field-experiment
Enterprise is, even now, planning to carry out … just days
after the eclipse … in Egypt, at the Pyramids!
To use them as gigantic "torsion amplifiers”–
Measuring the dramatically changing torsion field at Giza --
literally, the "Ancient Center of the World" -- as it is fundamentally
affected bythe last (in this Century …) “Venus Transit of
A solar eclipse occurs when the Moon comes
directly between Earth and the Sun -- and the Moon’s darkened hemisphere
“eclipses” (covers – because of the matching optical
diameters – see diagram, below) the much more distant (though 400
times larger!) solar surface … 93 million miles beyond.
This remarkable “coincidence of optical
diameters” (above) gives us the extraordinary solar system spectacle
of a “total solar eclipse” (below).
An “annular solar eclipse, by striking
contrast,” occurs when the Moon is slightly farther from
the Earth in its elliptical orbit than it is during a total eclipse (below),
and its darkened hemispheric silhouette “doesn’t quite cover
the sun …” as seen from Earth.
Resulting in a totally different visual eclipse
experience (below) ….
This particular “ring of fire”
annular eclipse (May 20, 2012) begins, as previously noted, on the other
side of the world … as the Moon’s shadow first encounters
the limb of Planet Earth, at local dawn, in southern China.
The track of maximum eclipse (below) then
races east northeast along the south China coast, crossing the East China
Sea … before darkening the skies over Tokyo -- prior to its heading
out, at over ~1500 mph -- across the vast Pacific, towards North America
As noted earlier, after crossing the Pacific,
the center line of the Moon’s shadow makes continental landfall
just south of the border between Oregon and California (below).
At increasing speed (because of the steepening “shadow
projection angle” to the setting Sun), the central shadow then crosses
famed “Mt. Shasta,” California (at "19.47" PM ...),
before racing (in quick succession) over portions of Nevada, Utah, Arizona
and New Mexico – only ending (at sunset) in west Texas -- as the
Moon’s shadow literally lifts off the Earth and into space once
And here is where THIS eclipse gets very interesting
The average odds of seeing a solar eclipse (annular or
total …) -- if you stay in one place and “wait for
one to come to you” -- are about “once every three hundred
Thus, it is most fortunate for Enterprise that
this eclipse (May 20, 2012) is coming right to us; the
centerline – and maximum time of “annularity” (~4 minutes,
20 seconds) – passes just south of Albuquerque, New Mexico (below),
allowing not only a spectacular front-row seat for witnessing (and photographing!)
a cosmically-astonishing phenomenon … but placing the rare event
directly over our unique—
Enterprise Mission “HD/Torsion-Field acquisition
So, what is a “Torsion-Field?”
Those of you who have been following our published work
for many years, or our
recent books, know that we have been investigating the factual basis
for “an ancient, previously lost ... and now, rediscovered Physics”
for some time; a set of modern theories and experiments which could match
both the mathematical geometry we “decoded” as the basis for
“Hyperdimensional/Torsion Field Physics” -- amid a set of
“artificial ruins” on
another planet (Mars!) -- as well as the reported scientific
and technological capabilities of VERY ancient cultures right here on
Earth … appearing now as “mere myths” in “tens
of thousands of years old … ancient, sacred texts.”
Our modern search for experimental correlations with these
ancient texts began with the “staggeringly anomalous, contemporary
physics results” reported by one “Dr. Maurice Allais”
in the mid-1950’s ….
In late June, 1954, Prize-winning “amateur”
French physicist (and later, a Nobel
Laurete in Economics for 1988 …) Maurice Allais (below - left),
was managing a specially-designed series of “paraconical pendulum
experiments” in his basement physics laboratory in Paris, France;
his unique pendulum design (below – right) allowed Allais to explore
inertial and gravitational phenomenon not available to the much better
known, widely available (but far longer – and thus, with much slower
periods) “Foucault Pendulums.”
Because of the “‘round-the-clock”
nature of his unique pendulum observations, Allais was assisted by a small
staff of laboratory technicians, who would work in shifts. One afternoon,
unknown to the technician on duty, at the time quietly conducting routine
pendulum experiments in the vibration-free, underground, windowless laboratory
that Allias had created for this specific scientific work … a partial
solar eclipse took place over “the City of Light” --
June 30, 1954 (below) ….
What that technician (Allais' Laboratory Head, Jacques
Bourgeot - below) observed and reported back to Allais as soon as his
experimental “run” was over -- regarding the pendulum’s
unique rotational behavior during (it was later determined)
the actual eclipse -- Allis described in his own experimental
notes afterward with just one word—
Allais also used the phrase “a brutal displacement”
… to describe the “sudden, extraordinary backwards
movement” of the pendulum his laboratory chief had seen (and carefully
recorded!), even while not knowing its “mysterious” cause
... until later that same afternoon.
Here (below) is what those “anomalous eclipse motions”
in Allias’ pendulum looked like; this graphic, adapted from Scientific
American, depicts the mechanical arrangement of Allais’ unique
paraconical pendulum (below – left).
The three vertical panels to its right illustrate the
pendulum’s “highly anomalous motions” -- recorded during
two partial solar eclipses to cross Allais’ Paris laboratory
in the 1950’s (the first in 1954, the second in 1959); the phase
of each eclipse that corresponded with these “anomalous motions,”
is depicted in the last three vertical strips (far right).
Clearly, a “normally swinging pendulum” –
suddenly, REVERSING its direction (as the graphic depicts) … and
rotating BACKWARDS during the actual eclipse – should have
been MAJOR scientific news!
That Allais was able to observe TWO such (partial) solar
eclipses – and from the same laboratory – recording
strikingly similar behavior during BOTH … is strong indication that
such “anomalous pendulum motions” are (somehow) an integral
part of the overall “eclipse phenomenon” – hitherto
unobserved by all previous astronomers and physicists—
Until … Allais’ unique pendulum experiment,
in 1954, “just happened to be underway that June afternoon, when
a solar eclipse coincidentally occurred [literally] overhead ….”
Here (below) is one of Allais’ graphs, representing
the pendulum’s azimuthal motions (red line) recorded across the
duration (vertical green lines – beginning, middle and end) of the
1954 Paris eclipse.
In the beginning, the normal pendulum clockwise angular
trend (the downward-sloping white line to the right) – termed the
“Foucault Effect” and due to Earth’s rotation –
can be seen at left, before the eclipse begins over Paris.
This normal, downward-sloping trend is abruptly REVERSED
(red line moving sharply upward) … as the Moon’s disc just
“kisses” the right-hand edge of the Sun (“first contact”
- top left).
From there, things rapidly got even more bizarre--
As the pendulum’s azimuth motion continues in an
accelerating, COUNTER-clockwise direction … for the next 45 minutes;
then, after peaking, the pendulum motion REVERSES direction (moving clockwise
again …), only to reverse BACK again (counterclockwise!) …
briefly [as the Moon reaches “mid-eclipse” (the central
green line)] -- before abruptly reversing once more, accelerating
again in a CLOCKWISE direction … before eventually “bottoming
out” … parallel to the ORIGINAL “Foucault/Earth rotation”
downward-sloping trend line!
After his literally YEARS of painstaking acquisition of
“thousands of hours of ‘normal’ pendulum behavior,”
Allais later wrote—
“... it must be further underscored that, during
all continuous observation periods [from 1953 through 1960], no variation
of the azimuth curve similar to branch BC -- corresponding to the solar
eclipse of June 30, 1954 [above] -- was ever observed [emphasis added]
Subsequently dubbed “the Allais Effect,”
and considered as “some type of gravitational anomaly”
by those researchers who subsequently tried to replicate Allais’
original eclipse results – overwhelmingly without consistent
success! -- Allais himself, describing his stunning eclipse observations
in the September,
1959 issue of "Aero/Space Engineering," noted:
“… the current theory of gravitation
(being the result of the application, within the current theory of relative
motions, of the principles of inertia and universal gravitation to any
one of the Galilean spaces) complemented or not by the corrections suggested
by the theory of relativity, leads to orders of magnitude [many factors
of ten] for lunar and solar action (which are strictly not to be perceived
experimentally) of some 100 million times less than the
effects noted [during the eclipse] ... [emphasis added].”
In other words, the pendulum motions Allais observed during
his two eclipses – 1954 and 1959 -- were physically IMPOSSIBLE …
according to all known “textbook physics!”
Allais’ ultimate “physical explanation”
for the dramatic and totally anomalous paraconical pendulum behavior he
observed, is summed up thus (below):
So, how do Allais’ extraordinary eclipse
observations fit into The Enterprise Mission Model of “Hyperdimensional/Torsion
Allais’ eventual (1999) explanation
for his pendulum’s erratic eclipse motions was to propose that “empty”
space, in fact, has some kind of underlying “structure”…
or “strain” – a changing “anisotropy”(in
other words, a changing “aether!”) – and, that during
a geometric alignment of planetary bodies (the Sun and Moon, during an
eclipse …) that underlying, constantly “changing spatial structure”
is briefly, physically ALIGNED with the Sun, Moon and Earth—
Resulting in an enhanced “anomalous
force” exerted on the swinging pendulum … which temporarily
(during the celestial alignment) counteracts all other forces acting on
that pendulum for the duration of that astronomical event; this force,
present at all times (according to Allais’ results) as “an
average of the effects from multiply interacting, constantly moving celestial
objects,” especially seeks to bring the plane of the pendulum’s
oscillation into co-alignment with the instantaneous Earth/Moon/Sun line
during a solar eclipse … when the local “spatial anisotropy”
(as measured from Earth) is strongest!
To say that Allais’ ultimate “explanation”
for his striking pendulum anomaly was “controversial” would
be a “classic” understatement; the overwhelming majority of
astronomers and physicists even aware of his experiments in the 1950’s
and 60’s, immediately (and trivially) dismissed Allias’ 1954
observations as “obviously an operator error ….”
After the SECOND series of (replicated) “anomalous pendulum observations,”
in 1959, the attacks against Allais’ scientific credibility subtly
shifted; from “it DIDN’T happen” … to a variety
of much more “mundane” explanations, like—
“… the colder air created by
the temporary blockage of sunlight from the eclipse track, produced over
Allais’ laboratory a ‘wind’ … which blew against
the pendulum ‘bob,’ resulting in the sudden changing plane
of motion ….”
In an underground … sealed
The heart of all good science is “replication.”
By repeating his “anomalous
1954 observations” five years later, during another solar eclipse
over Paris (in October, 1959), Allais fulfilled every essence of “good
science” – even if the mainstream theoretical community was
(and still is!) completely baffled by his remarkable,
physically replicable ... meticulously empirical observations.
The overlaid graph (below), containing the
paraconical pendulum data from BOTH sets of eclipse observations, proves
the elemental point:
While the minute-by-minute details of the two “pendulum
azimuth curves” show fascinating (and important) differences (in
our analysis, due to the significantly different geometry of
the 1959 eclipse – covering only 23.2% of the solar surface, compared
to the 62.9% in 1954), the overall shape of the “azimuth
response curves” of both events is essentially the same!
How is this related to The Enterprise Mission’s
upcoming “real-time” physics measurements of the May 20th
“annular solar eclipse?”
It is our conclusion, based on extensive reading of all
Allais’ available notes on his unique eclipse results, that his
description of “an experimentally provable, anisotropy
of space ... caused by moving and aligning planetary bodies”
... and ours -- of “a vorticular, interactive torsion field
… linking all rotating and aligning interplanetary objects”
Are, essentially, the same!
Again, the central premise underpinning all of
Science is the theme of "replication"; if the same investigator,
carrying out the same experiment a second ... and third time, gets the
same results (within small margins of error), this adds to the
likelihood of the original phonomenon under investigation being correctly
If totally independent researchers pursue a "similar experiment"
re the same phenomenon, and also independently derive "similar results,"
the subject under investigation immediately assumes a much higher degree
of "reality" ... rapidly increasing with each such independent
So, it should be gratifying to discover that -- completely
independent of Allais's own confirming results eleven years before (his
two eclipses) -- in March, 1970, two other scientists observed
another remarkably similar "anomalous rotational phenomenon"--
During another solar eclipse!
The occasion was the March 7, 1970 "Eclipse of the
Century" (as all the US national media -- including CBS News, whom
I was advising at the time -- inevitably hyped it); the black shadow of
the Moon racing up the entire East Coast of the United States (below)
-- blotting out the Sun for millions of awe-struck "eclipse watchers,"
from Florida to Cape Cod, dashing past Maine and then across Newfoundland
(thereby casually triggring another unforgettable Carly Simon song ...)
-- before heading out over the far northern Atlantic Ocean, east of the
Unfortunately, totally unknown to me at the
time [with my hands already full, coordinating and co-producing our totally
unprecedented "CBS News Eclipse Coverage" -- which included
design and construction of a literal "flying telescope," to
capture and then televise the spectacle to millions of excited
viewers living outside the narrow "path of totality," from a
"pool" KC-135 jet transport we "borrowed" from the
US Air Force specifically for this event; chasing the eclipse shadow --
at ~500 miles per hour ~40,000 feet over Savannah, GA. -- while broadcasting
totality (never been done before from ~40,000 feet ...) to all THREE national
television networks, LIVE to the ground]--
Another pioneering "torsion eclipse experiment" was
quietly, simultaneously, being carried out just outside of Boston ...
far to the north of our eclipse chaser "707-type" telescope-carrying
That non-optical experiment -- one of hundreds
previously conducted by industrialist (and physicist) Erwin Saxl, and
his scientific colleague, Mildred Allen -- was being carried out this
March afternoon just outside the path of totality (eclipse magnitude ~96%).
Saxl had spent the previous seventeen years conducting similar "torsion
pendulum" experiments -- including, specific observing "runs"
made during previous eclipses -- at his own private laboratory (very silimar
to Allais), in the basement of his home in the little town of Harvard,
Massachusetts, located about 20 miles west of Boston.
Saxl's lab equipment for these long-running "gravitational experiments"
consisted of a horizontally rotating weight -- termed a "torsion
pendulum" (as opposed to the vertically mounted "paraconical"
pendulums of Allias) -- which, instead of swinging "to and fro,"
rotated horizontally "left, then right" ... on a fine,
pre-stressed, vertically suspended, specially-made ("Ni-span C")
steel wire ... during each run of Saxl's rotational experiment.
The concept behind Saxl's device was simple:
The full period of "one clockwise/counter-clockwise partial rotation"
of the vertically-suspended weight (below) -- through a small angle --
was optically measured from the pendulum's initial release point; the
subsequent "left/right" rotational motion of the "bob"
-- driven by the weight of the bob and the "twisting tension"
in the wire from which the massive bob was hung -- determined the length
of time (the "period") of one "torsion measurement"
[an overall schematic, from his original patent, of Saxl's massive machine
(to eliminate unwanted vibrations) is illustrated below].
Saxl's torsion pendulum readings (below) -- taken
before, during and after the actual March 7 eclipse -- are most revealing;
as he and Allen later reported, in "1970
Solar Eclipse as 'Seen' by a Torsion Pendulum," published in
the February 15, 1971 issue of the peer-reviewed scientific journal, "Physical
"... Significant variations in the recorded times
[of one "left/right" oscillation] were observed during
the course of the eclipse, as is shown by the full [red] line
in Figure 1. Each point in this figure is the result of five consecutive
[electrically] grounded readings. The limited vertical lines
indicate the average deviations of the five readings from the averaged
circled values. The beginning of the eclipse at 12:31 p.m., its mid-point
at 1:40 p.m. and its end at 2:58 p.m. are also indicated [by the
three vertical yellow lines, marked "a" ... "b" ...
and "c"] on the graph. It is to be noted that these observed
time intervals [of pendulum bob partial rotations/oscillations]
level off at about 29.581 sec [for one full oscillation] after
the end of the eclipse, whereas in the morning [4:00 AM EST] they
had started at about 29.570 sec, an appreciable difference inasmuch as
the ["full period"] times can be read to 0.00001 sec
and are significant to about 0.0001 sec. The precision of the quartz-crystal-controlled
oscillator in the Beckman EPUT (events per unit time) counter is one part
in '10 to the exponent 8' ...."
As with Allais' first startling observations of his eclipse,
sixteen years earlier, Saxl and Allen also noted "peculiar waves"
in the torsion pendulum's behavior ... seen well before the eclipse
had even begun locally in the Boston area (above - bottom left) ....
"... the irregularities occurring before the
start of the eclipse might be considered accidental, except that data
taken two weeks later at the same hour of the day (dashed
green curve - above) show corresponding humps -- an indication,
by the way, that the observations are reproducible. These
maxima and minima may indicate a kind of gravitational [sic]
fine structure which is reproducible even when the positions of the sun
and moon relative to the earth are quite different. This apparent wavelike
structure has been observed over the course of many years
at our Harvard laboratory. It cannot be predicted on the basis of classical
gravitational theory nor has it been observed in the quasistationary
experiments underlying this theory (e.g., spring-operated gravimeters,
seismographs, and interferometer devices) ... [emphasis added] ...."
Saxl and Allen went on to note that to explain these remarkable eclipse
observations, according to "conventional Newtonian/Einsteinian gravitational
theory," an increase in the weight of the pendumum bob itself
on the order of ~5% would be required ... amounting to (for the ~51.5-lb
pendulum bob in the experiment) an increase of ~2.64 lbs!
This would be on the order of one hundred thousand
(100,000) times greater than any possible "gravitational
tidal effects" Saxl and Allen calculated (using Newtonian Gravitational
Theory/ Relativity Theory) for even the 180-degree, "opposite"
alignment of the sun and moon ... which, as previously noted, was also
directly measured via the torsion pendulum (dasned green line
- above) two weeks after the March 7 eclipse!
The two scientists then observed:
"... It is further to be noted that the greatest
change [in the torsion pendulum oscillation period] occurs between
the [local] onset of the eclipse and its midpoint [below
- right]. This agrees qualitatively with Allais with
a paraconical pendulum, where the change of azimuth increased
substantially in the first half of the eclipse of 30 June 1954
[below - left]. Both these effects would seem to have a gravitational
basis [sic] which cannot be explained by accepted classical
theory [emphasis added] ...."
Saxl and Allen concluded:
"... Quantitative observations made
with a precise torsion pendulum show, in agreement with many earlier,
less precise recordings made at Harvard since 1953, that the times required
to traverse a fixed fraction of its total angular path [of a 360-degree
full rotation] vary markedly during the hours before
the eclipse and during its first half, i.e. up to its midpoint. Also the
significant changes in these times do not coincide exactly with
the astronomically determined onset, midpoint, and endpoint of the eclipse.
"These variations are too great
to be explained on the basis of classical gravitational theory, by the
relative changes in position of the moon with respect to the earth and
sun. This leads to the same conclusion arrived at by Allais -- that classic
gravitational theory needs to be modified to interpret
his (and our) experimental results [emphasis
Two decades after Allais’ pioneering
pendulum discoveries, and about four years after the equally remarkable
Sax-Allen torsion pendulum confirmations reported above, another "out-of-the-box"
physicist whose work we have been carefully following for decades -- our
now departed friend and colleague, MIT physicist Bruce DePalma (below)
– began conducting an
equally landmark series of similar experiments ... in rotation
-- also beginning with pendulums, in the mid-1970’s.
But, unlike Allais,’ whose weight on the end of his pendulum rod
was stationary, DePalma's bobs were deliberately ROTATED -- as they also
swung to and fro ….
To his amazement, DePalma’s rotating
pendulums immediately exhibited very DIFFERENT swinging characteristics
… compared to his (and Allais') pendulums with non-rotating
Again, NOTHING in Newtonian mechanics, Relativity,
et al. could account theoretically for such astonishing dynamical behavior
Reading about DePalma's truly remarkable
results (long before we began to actively collaborate) was the beginning
of our own realization (still unknowing of the remarkably convergent Saxl-Allen
torsion pendulum data - above) that “HD/Torsion Field Physics”
(from “torque” … “spin”) required
some form of basic “rotation” … before it would reveal
its deepest secrets – likely, the primary reason why such extraordinary
anomalous effects had escaped generations of previous experimental
physicists; they, basically because of engineering and technological limitations,
had chosen to conduct the overwhelming majority of early mechanical experiments
– testing Newton’s Laws, and various gravitational predictions
on a laboratory scale -- on non-rotating models ….
Because -- as Allais,’ Saxl and DePalma
each painfully discovered, independently – it was EXTRAORDINARILY
difficult to achieve consistent (“reproducible”) scientific
precision … in any rotating mechanical system -- attempting
to measure such easily overwhelmed (by surface irregularities in the pendulum
support, surface friction, temperature imbalances, etc., etc.) far more
subtle, non-mechanical “spatial forces” ….
As I’ve written elsewhere, DePalma
slowly realized from his own pendulum experiments that a) something fundamentally
“different” was going on with his “rotating pendulum
bobs” … compared to the non-rotating versions; and b) that
“difference” might be, in fact, due to the (somehow) literally
changing of the physical inertia of his rotating mechanical
It was at this point that Bruce DePalma
brilliantly conceived of using an “Accutron" wrist watch (newly-introduced
by Bulova, just years before, as “the first new thing in timekeeping
in 300 years …”) as
a unique "scientific instrument" in his continuing rotational experiments
To (inexpensively) test his radical “inertia-changing”
rotational hypothesis, DePalma focused on the unique mechanical properties
of this newly commercially-available “space age” wrist watch;
based on “a totally new principle in commercial time-keeping [as
advertised by Bulova - below]" – a miniaturized tuning fork,
vibrating at 360 cycles per second (hertz) inside the watch, powered by
a tiny mercury battery (which also governed a “transistorized feedback
circuit” to counter the effects of “mechanical shocks”)
– the Accutron proved to be the ideal “off-the-shelf”
sensor for DePalma’s on-going efforts to understand the true nature
of the mind-blowing “inertia-changing properties” of simply
rotating an object!
Key to this instrumentation breakthrough was DePalma’s
understanding that, the Accutron’s tuning fork constituted another
“rotating object” (below) – as the back and forth mechanical
motion of the fork neatly mimicked a portion of a pendulum’s much
larger (also “rotational”) swing during his earlier experiments
To carry out his tests (in the days before
affordable digital readout systems for non-governmental projects were
readily -- and inexpensively! – available), DePalma simply glued
an Accutron “Spaceview” to the face of a grid-driven “Westclock”
(below)! He then synchronized the second hands of both time pieces,
and placed the combo in close proximity to a specially-designed, rapidly
rotating mechanical system (a ~30-lb steel/aluminum disc, spun
at ~8000 RPM).
Based on his previous “anomalous pendulum experiments,”
DePalma theorized that mere “rotation of mass” (somehow) produces
“an anomalous space-field” around it (which, with his quirky
sense of humor, he decided to call “the OD field”) -- capable
of fundamentally altering (and interacting with …) the
inertia of other rotating objects.
DePalma therefore reasoned that the “anomalous
effects” of this “OD field” should significantly alter
the inertia (and thus, the frequency) of the tiny, vibrating
tuning fork INSIDE the Accutron—
When the disc was spinning ….
Making (he hoped) the entire Accutron run visibly (via
the synchronized second hands) faster … or slower,
when directly compared with the grid-powered Westclock to which it was
Again, the “secret” here – in comparing
Allais’ pendulum results with those of Bruce Depalma (and, his planned
Accutron experiment) – is that even a “non-rotating”
pendulum (or vibrating tuning fork) is, in fact, a system in inertial
rotation!; DePalma’s attachment of a “spinning bob”
to his pendulums merely amplified their innate, originally much weaker
interactions with the “OD field” … by orders of
magnitude … more than Allais’ own, earlier, non-rotating
The vibrating tuning fork inside the Accutron, DePalma
reasoned, should be even MORE responsive,
This, in turn, was why Allais’ much shorter (faster
swinging) “paraconical pendulums” quickly revealed their exotic
“non-Newtonian behavior” … that the much longer-length
(and thus, much slower swinging) “Foucault Pendulums” had
NOT; the key was the lower “angular momentum” possessed by
Allais’ (more responsive) pendulums … compared to those of
Foucault’s original design!
After placing the Accutron/Westclock combination directly
over one of the “poles” of the high-speed spinning disc, and
after shielding the timepieces from any possible “magnetic or electrical
interference" (with a special layer of “co-netic foil”
– see diagram), when DePalma fired up his ingenuous” Accutron
experiment,” lo and behold–
After only 17 minutes (1000 seconds …),
LOST almost … one full second!
For such a revolutionary “space age” watch
technology, being presented in Bulova ads all over as “guaranteed
for one full year not to gain or lose more than two seconds
a day …” [emphasis added]—
This staggering loss of “time” – and,
in mere minutes – merely in the presence of “a simple,
spinning flywheel” – and, at a rate exceeding up
to 850 percent Accutron’s much-touted accuracy! -- not only resoundingly
confirmed DePalma’s basic premise [that a “rotating
mass could change (somehow) the inertia of the tuning fork inside
the Accutron], it confirmed that simple rotation of any object
could change the inertial properties of any other rotating object
… certainly in its immediate proximity!
This confirmation now gave DePalma a reliable means to
“map the ‘OD field’” around any rotating
By experimenting further, DePalma quickly learned that
placing the Accutron above either “pole” of a rotating
object … INCREASED the inertia of the tuning fork – resulting
in a dramatic slowdown of the watch; placing the Accutron alongside
the “equator” of the same rotating disc, by contrast, resulted
in a dramatic decrease in the tuning fork inertia ... and a resulting
dramatic “gain of time.”
Clearly, the “OD field” surrounding something
in rotation was a) NOT symmetrical, and b) not even of the same “sign”
… from point to point around the spinning disc.
This bizarre “asymmetrical OD field spatial geometry”
was also clearly NOT shared by any of science’s well-established
other force “fields”:
Magnetism … electrostatics … gravitation--
Which are all spherically symmetric -- and decrease
in intensity (measureable force …) “inversely with the square
of distance” … regardless of the direction from which
the field intensity is being measured.
Compared to these, DePalma’s highly geometric
“OD field” REALLY was … completely “odd.”
Allais, two decades earlier, had independently realized
that his “anisotropy of space” -- like DePalma’s “OD
field” -- also ONLY seemed detectable via interaction with other
systems in rotation (in his case, the swinging pendulum itself
– see above); further decades later, in his 1999 "Memo
to NASA" -- providing new experimental details on his results, and
instructions to all those who would attempt to verify his findings during
the then much-hyped “NASA measurements” of the upcoming “1999
Total Solar Eclipse over Europe” -- Allais warned NASA scientists
“These [anomalous eclipse] effects can only
be observed when the pendulum is moving ….”
This, of course, now instantly explains why most investigators
across the years -- seeking to confirm the “Allais Effect”
with static-based “gravimeters,” during a score of
later solar eclipses taking place all over the world – have generally
FAILED; they have (almost to a man …), demonstrably NOT heeded the
first principle of “scientific replication”:
Duplicate ALL the parameters of the original researcher’s
By ASSUMING that the “Allais Effect” was (somehow)
based on “changes to Earth’s gravity” during
an eclipse, these would-be pioneers totally missed the Real “message”
of Allais' experiment!
They, over and over again (uselessly!), repeatedly tried
to replicate Allais’ startling observations with simple, standard,
static-spring gravimeters; in fact, this “new physics” strikes
at the heart of the so-called “Einstein Equivalence Principle”
… supposedly existing between “mass” (gravity) and “inertia”
(resistance to motion) ever since Relativity was published ... revealing
now that a rotating object’s “inertia” can be dramatically
changed, just by being placed it in the vicinity of another
Based on these stunning results, it was clear to us many
years ago that DePalma and Allais (and, when we learned about their remarkable
third confirmation, Saxl and Allen) each, independently, consecutively,
had serendipitously stumbled across the same fundamental hallmark of what
is now known generally as--
Torsion Field Physics ….
The “impossible” (by all current science)
… rotational modification … of “inertially-measured”
As we have reported extensively before (Dark
Mission: the Secret History of NASA, Chapter II), work on “torsion
fields” is NOT even a "new" development.
It actually all began with the classic "Einstein-Cartan"
theoretical exploration of "static torsion" equations, in 1913; initially
predicted to be SO weak, that it would have ZERO effect in the “real”
world, later physicists discovered a crucial “flaw” in one
of Carten’s mathematical assumptions vis a vis Relativity, changing
the negative"Carten-Einstein predictions of “NON-observable
torsion field effects ...” – upwards ... by some “twenty
two orders of magnitude!”—
While, at the same time, the new calculations revealing
that “torsion waves” could also propagate (unlike
the “static torsion” of Carten’s original calculations)
far from their original rotating sources … spiraling (hence
the term “torsion” ... ) through “space-time”
(the “aether”), at potentially--
Billions of times the speed of light!
Enter “Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev.”
Just after WWII, a brilliant Russian astrophysicist,
N.A. Kozyrev -- newly-released from Stalin’s Gulag -- began in the
old Soviet Union his first experimental investigations into what he eventually
would term "POSSIBILITY
OF EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF [THE] PROPERTIES OF TIME"; in fact,
though Kozyrev didn’t seem to realize it while he was conducting
his experiments, his own diverse and highly anomalous mechanical and electrical
experimental results, carried out over more than 30 years, confirmed many
of the most extraordinary theoretical predictions associated with “interacting,
propagating torsion fields ….”
Over many succeeding decades, from a variety
of physicists around the world, these same “anomalous phenomena”
now been independently rediscovered many, many additional times; decades
after Kozyrev, Allias and DePalma carried out their historic rotational
experiments -- a Russian theoretical physicist, Dr. Gennady Shipov, following
on the wide-ranging experimental work of Kozyrev himself, wrote:
“… in the science of mechanics,
Torsion Fields prove -- through [their propagating] fields of inertia
-- that the phenomenon of inertia is
more fundamental than even the gravitational phenomena [emphasis
Someone -- finally, fully -- “got it!”
Which brings us back to the “window” for
unique research presenting itself here, in Albuquerque, on May 20th; the
remarkable opportunity to measure, first-hand -- with our own Enterprise
Mission significantly modified Accutron technology -- the far-reaching,
changing “torsion field effects” of the upcoming May 20, 2012
annular solar eclipse.
Based on our in-depth study of DePalma’s stunningly
positive, decades-old Accutron results, since 2003 we have taken this
“off-the-shelf, torsion-measuring technology” literally around
the world [in part, with the help of a MAJOR television network (NBC)],
to a variety of “ancient sacred sites” (as on the summits
of the Pyramid of the Sun and Pyramid of the Moon, at Teotihuacan, Mexico
- below), as well as to two “key celestial occultation [alignment]
Given the “digital revolution” that has overtaken
all of us since Bruce DePalma carried out his original crude “analog”
Accutron experiments ~40 years ago, we have, of course, been able to make
a few “upgrades” to how the tuning fork motions are permanently
recorded; a read-out (from a sensor “pick-up” underneath the
watch) is now sampled digitally, and a special computer program
written for Accutron watch repairers (to monitor the frequency performance
of the tuning fork during routine maintenance), is used to sample and
display – in real time – the moment-to-moment “frequency
drift” of the tuning fork itself.
These electrical signals are fed, via a shielded cable
… into a specially-designed “crystal reference comparator
box” (watch timer) containing a quartz-crystal frequency standard,
vibrating at several million times per second, thus allowing
“millionths of a hertz” frequency resolution of the Accutron
tuning fork’s basic “360 hertz” vibration.
From this “frequency comparator box,” the
now combined electrical signals are fed to a laptop or desktop computer,
via another shielded cable -- where the specially-written computer program
records the frequency information coming from the Accutron, while simultaneously
displaying the real-time tuning fork read-outs on the screen.
A schematic of this digitized Enterprise Accutron
“torsion measuring instrumentation” is displayed here (below).
When used in an actual field setting by Enterprise
-- to measure changes in the “background torsion field” in
the vicinity of (and even on!) several Old and New World “sacred
sites” (including, Mayan Pyramids at Teotihuacan and Tikal) –
the updated Accutron “Hyperdimensional/Torsion Field sensing technology”
performed exactly as DePalma’s pioneering measurements
proved it did … ~40 years before!
Digital Accutron readings taken atop the “Pyramid
of the Sun,” at Teotihuacan, Mexico (below) – recorded precisely
at Dawn, in April, 2009 – demonstrated huge “excursions”
in the Accutron tuning fork frequency modulation—
Corresponding EXACTLY to our predicted model:
That, at every sunrise, the Sun -- “poised on the
edge of the world … ‘Horus of the Horizon’ …”
– as the Earth is rotating directly towards it at maximum
velocity, should produce a MAJOR inertial “hiccup” in the
background torsion field … for all rotating objects at
the “terminator”… if just for a few seconds.
And, it does.
Before Enterprise conducted its readings with
this unique “HD/Torsion Field measurement technology” at selected
global sacred sites (above), it had an earlier opportunity to try out
its new torsion field detection system on an actual, live (and very rare
…) Celestial Alignment Event – ala “Maurice Allais”:
The Venus Transit of June 8, 2004.
Venus (second planet from the Sun …) and Earth (the
third) orbit at a slight inclination to each other’s paths (3.39
degrees); this small tilt causes Venus to pass just “above”
or “below” the Sun at almost every “inferior conjunction”
(when Venus is geometrically between the Sun and Earth - below).
However, there are two rare intervals -- separated by
eight years, and occurring at average intervals of ~113 years apart --
when the two planets’ orbits synchronize simultaneously
at one of the two “nodes” (where the planes of Venus and Earth’s
orbits cross - above) … and Venus can then appear as “a small
black dot” … moving, over several hours, across the brilliant
background surface of the Sun (below).
This is what is called a “transit.”
The first Venus Transit, in this century, occurred in
2004; the next (and last) will occur in mid-2012 ....
During the 2004 Venus Transit, we were able to place our
Accutron detector inside a mysterious, “~1000-ton limestone monument"
(located south of Miami at "Homestead," in Southern Florida)
-- a fascinating place called “Coral Castle” (below). Constructed
in the 1950’s by one man – Ed Leedskalnin – the Latvian
immigrant stone mason claimed to have built it single-handedly,
“on the secret knowledge of those who built the Pyramids of Egypt
We chose Coral Castle for our first Accutron
“torsion field-test,” because a) we couldn’t AFFORD
to go to Egypt to measure the Physics of the Transit at the actual Pyramids
(!), and b) the material which Leedskalnin used to build his “ enigmatic
~1000-ton monument” – oolitic limestone, found as a “bedrock”
under most of Florida – in fact, possesses “torsion amplification
properties” very similar (we believed …) to the much larger
limestone blocks from which the Great Pyramid (and the others) in Egypt
is also composed ….
“Calcium carbonate” –
the major mineral component making up "limestone," both in Florida
and at Giza -- is (based on Kozyrev’s results) a very active
The Enterprise Accutron data (below)
-- recorded during the hours-long Venus Transit of 2004 -- confirmed ALL
these previous predictions.
This graph (above) depicts the last ~90 minutes of the
2004 Transit (and its “interesting” aftermath” …);
it specifically covers the moment of “third contact” –
when Venus’ limb first touched the limb of the Sun, as the Earth-sized
planet was ending its hours-long, preceding Transit across the surface
of the Sun, as seen from Earth ….
What’s staggering about this graph is the sudden
“falling off the cliff” the Accutron tuning fork displays
– EXACTLY, as Venus’ limb makes third contact with
the solar limb; at that precise moment, the tuning fork goes WILD …
rising immediately and dramatically in frequency (the software plots “rising
frequencies,” on this display, as “down”) -- meaning,
that the tuning fork’s inertia is suddenly (somehow) decreasing
(so it’s vibrating faster) … PRECISELY as the two limbs “kiss,”
Venus and Sun.
This is telling us something … physically …
Not only regarding the nature and response of this extraordinary
“torsion tool” that my friend Bruce DePalma left behind ~40
years ago, but of the intense “torsion process” itself …
a deep, hitherto unseen variety of physical field interaction
between the Earth … Venus … and the Sun.
A detailed close-up of the end of Venus’ 2004 Transit
is even more revealing ….
This (below) is a RedShift simulation of the exact moment
of third contact; note where Venus spin axis is pointing ...
relative to the spin axis of the Sun (the latter 90 degrees to the faint
latitude lines across the solar surface) ....
As Venus progresses from “third contact” through
the “fourth” (last image, below - Venus externally
tangent with the solar limb …), the Accutron fork simultaneously
progresses through a series of sharp, harmonically decreasing
“tones” (remember, higher vuibratory rates are displayed “down”
in this software) – the “torsion spikes” shifting progressively
to lower and lower frequencies … as Venus slowly moves
off the Sun.
There is real new Science here!
Hidden in this data are priceless new details
of how Venus’ backwards rotation (in 243 Earth days), compared
to the Sun’s prograde spin (in ~27 days), are deeply interacting
… at a fundamental torsion level.
And, how the intersection of the two spin
axes -- Venus' and the Sun (which were essentially parallel during
this entire Transit) -- seem to play a key role in modulating
(somehow ...) these rapidly changing "torsion harmonics" ...
as the Venus Transit (remember, with Venus rotating backwards,
relative to the sun's spin) physically comes to an end ....
Like “stirring cream backwards …
in a solar system 'coffee cup.'”
Rotation ... rotation ... rotation ....
These Enterprise Accutron results,
painstakingly recorded in 2004, now overwhelmingly confirm--
We DO live in a Hyperdimensional Solar System …
with ALL those attendant implications.
The extraordinary concept of a Physics-based, actual "Hyperdimensional
astrology" ... involving the relative positions of the planets
and the Sun, and their real, measureable torsion effects (above)
on a variety of phenomenon on Earth, including--
What new aspects of these fundamental -- if still
essentially unknown – interplanetary forces will we discover next
… during our coming “torsion Eclipse opportunity?”--
May 20, 2012.
In a more ways than one, the North American Solar Eclipse,
occurring in the next few days, is the perfect "dress rehearsal"
for the potentially even more revealing "Last Venus Transit of the
21st Century" ... to follow just two weeks after that; as can be
seen (below), the Solar Eclipse (this time) is but a geometrically magnified
version of the coming Transit!--
Allowing a unique probing -- with our Enterprise Accutron technology
-- of the same, underlying, baffling torsion phenomenon ... exemplified
* * *
Enterprise HD/Torsion Physics Observations
of the Upcoming May 20th Solar Eclipse … and June 6th Venus Transit
It should now be clear:
The Enterprise Mission -- in terms
of the two major, premiere “celestial events of 2012” -- is
singularly equipped to conduct ground-breaking scientific observations
of their most fundamental properties – using a unique “HD/torsion
technology,” capable of recording dimensions of both phenomenon
literally unavailable to researchers in any other way.
Because of the necessity to complete fundraising for
our critical, follow-on HD/torsion observations of the Last Venus Transit,
occurring just two weeks after the May 20th Eclipse (on June 6th) –
this time, from the Giza Plateau (using the Pyramids as we originally
envisioned, testing their potentials as DELIBERATE “ancient torsion
amplifiers”) – it occurred to us that the significant Enterprise
constituency might be willing to help us achieve this larger Goal, via
Millions of folks have demonstrably been following our
research work … for decades -- on “Coast to Coast AM,”
through The Enterprise Mission website, on various national
and international television Specials, and (recently) on Facebook; what
if, we wondered, we could offer all these audiences a way to
participate -- in real time -- in our continuing investigative
efforts, as well as a means of supporting our on-going research into a
potential “lost, high-tech Ancient Global Civilization
…” via our upcoming, vital “Egyptian Venus Transit Expedition”—
With a LIVE, subscription webcast of our May
20th “lunar/solar torsion measurements” – with their
unique (and therefore, totally unpredictable – in terms
of torsion readings) – annular eclipse geometry…
accompanied by a minute-by-minute, illustrated commentary?--
During the Eclipse experience!
The clearly revolutionary nature of these fundamental
measurements – throwing both Newton AND Einstein “in the ash
can of history,” simultaneously … through the changed
vibrations of a simple tuning fork – cannot be overstated; to PROVE,
via the dramatically changing Accutron readings, that “mass”
and “inertia” are NOT “equivalent” (which has
been the cornerstone of modern Physics for the last ~100 years), is totally
“paradigm changing” ... for every level of society.
As part of this Enterprise "torsion physics
democratization effort," it also occurred to us that a network
of observers -- each simultaneously recording their own Accutron measurements
from diverse geographical locations along the Eclipse path -- would bolster
the overall scientific results in way that no single set of observations
could; so far, we have lined up two additional, widely-separated "Accutron
Eclipse observing stations" (in addition to our own Enterprise
Mission measurements on the central eclipse track, in Albuquerque,
for the May 20th Event - marked with our logo, below) ; one station is
located well to the north of the eclipse track, in Chicago, Illinois (marked
with a yellow "crescent sun" at the bottom of Lake Michigan);
the other, to the south of the track, in Phoenix, Arizona (marked by another
yellow "cresecent sun").
The Chicago Accutron obervations will be conducted by one of our Enterprise
Associates, IT specialist Kimberly Reck; the Phoenix data will be collected
by an electrical engineer, Bill Alek, long-time colleague (Bill assembled
our first "Accutron Torsion Detector," in 2003) and Chief Director
and President of PROGRESSIVE
TECH CENTER, INC.
In Chicago, in addition to measuring the "lunar/solar alignment torsion
effects" at the earliest stages of the eclipse (and, well north geographically
of the other stations in this growing "network"), the maximum
solar obscuration by the Moon in Chicago will occur well after
local sunset (!) -- thus, allowing unique Accutron measurements of possible
"secondary torsion effects" -- from an indirect resonance
with the Earth torsion field itself!
The Phoenix station, by contrast, will "see" the entire geometric
progression of this eclipse, well-placed in the sky above the local horizon
for the duration of the Event -- from its beginning, through the mid-point,
to the end. However, Phoenix will not experience the "full, central
annular event" we will record at Enterprise, in
Albuquerque; this will allow for an important test in Phoenix of the
geometric effects curiously noted previously by other eclipse observers
(Allais, Saxl & Allen - above) -- which have all observed curious
"mis-timings" of key pendulum events, NOT correlated with the
optical "beginning," middle" and "end" of their
respective eclipses ....
And, during our conversations with Kim about data procedures for her "Chicago
station," she brought up another VERY interesting point:
"What," she asked, "do you suppose the Torsion Effect will
be on the massive electrical generators for the Grid -- situated
under or close to the eclipse track itself -- given that they're major,
mechanical spinning systems ...?"
It is an exquisite question ... one that we have been wondering about
(literally) for years.
A careful exmination of the
May 20th eclipse track (below), reveals that the path of "annularity"
will pass very close (~96%) to the largest collection of "spinning
generators" in the Great American Southwest--
The well-known, Depression Era power-generating "eighth wonder of
the world" facility, lying just east of Las Vegas, Nevada (above)--
At the base of this 726-foot high
Dam (the height of a 60-story skyscraper), inside the two separate 650-foot
long, 245-foot high powerhouses -- the "Nevada" side (left)
and the "Arizona" side (right) -- sit seventeen (17), 2000-ton
electrical generators (each one weighing as much as four and a half
Boeing-400 747s!) -- and each spinning at 90 revolutions/minute, collectively
generating a shade over 2000 megawatts (below)!
All those massive, spinning systems
Over the years, as our investigation turned up more and
more evidence that (in the words of Allais) "the ... [eclipse] effects
observed ... are of dynamic origin, not static as for
the deviation of the vertical or of the intensity of gravity [emphasis
It became clear that "rotating systems" were
essential to not only generating torsion waves ... but to detecting
them as well!
Thus, given DePalma's astonishing results with his "30-lb spinning
flywheel and the Accutron," it has always been one of our objectives
to someday measure the "torsion effects" of the massive, rotating
turbines and electrical generators ... at the base of Hoover Dam!
Kim's perceptive question, and this eclipse, neatly reminded
us of our long-standing intentions.
So, what should we expect to see ... if the critical alignment of the
Moon and Sun during this eclipse -- almost EXACTLY over Hoover Dam itself
(in the late afternoon of May 20th) -- does, indeed, significantly
affect those extraordinary spinning turbine-generator combinations?
The easiest way to measure any such effects would be to monitor the frequency
of the alternating (AC) current flowing from those generators into the
rest of the Southwest Electrical Grid; that "line frequency"
-- established by Nicoli Tesla himself over 100 years ago, at 60 hertz
(60 cycles per second), could show a detectable deviation across
the entire Southwest Grid of several hertz (!), and for tens of seconds,
before the computer-run "feedback systems" established to maintain
the grid frequency constant, were able to correct the massive, spinning
generators' rotation -- with all their combined angular momentun -- back
to their crucial "standard 60 hertz!"
So, how can folks reading this Update participate in looking for these
fascianting "torsion effects" on those crucial electrical generators?:
By monitoring the "line frequency" of the alternating electrical
current entering their individual homes and apartments from the Grid!;
using an "off-the-shelf, digital frequency monitor"-- which
can be picked up at many local electrical supply outlets, from "Best
Buy" to "Radio Shack!"
Some of those that are commercially available, in addition to an LCD screen
showing the instantaneous display of the frequency of the online current
(once the device is connected through a conventient wall outlet to the
Grid) even have their own digital read-out ports -- allowing
direct connection to a PC, where the data can be ditigally monitored in
the computer and stored for later analysis (and, e-mailing to Enterprise!).
Curiously, the best time to look for such revealing, potentially detectable
frequency changes to the Grid (which, incidentally, can be done hundreds
of miles from Hoover Dam itself!), might not be during the local
height of the eclipse over Hoover Dam itself. but earlier; because of
the critical geometric nature of the lunar/solar alignment effects
in creating the torsion weaves observed during the eclipse, rotating systems
located (literally!) on the other side of the planet from where the eclipse
is optically visible, can experience a detectable change in their
own local frequency of rotation/vibration!
Because of the highly geometric nature of torsion wave generation and
propagation, it is also possible that detectable effects of spinning systems
could be observed at 90-degrees to the eclipse path!
This is why (ultimately) a world-wide grid of "Accutron Torsion Detection
Stations" -- for global monitoring of the effects of such eclipses
(and other "celestial alignment events") -- needs to be established
For this occassion, as the eclipse begins over the south China coast at
22:09 Universal Time (GMT), with the Moon's shadow just touching the planet's
surface at a tangent, at Dawn, other potential observing locations --
on the other side of the world, but along that same
eclipse track -- COULD be detectably affected ... even though the optical
eclipse is occurring at that moment on the "far side" of the
As can be seen in the Northern Hemisphere "polar projection"
map (below), this includes a huge swath of Asia and Africa; on those continents,
directly opposite the actual eclipse as the day progresses, an active
Accutron detection system could record some remarkable results from THIS
eclipse, if any were inplace; in addition, their "grid frequencies"
could be affected ... as the torsion geometry THROUGH the planet affected
the rotating electrical generators supplying their local power off the
For us, located in New Mexico (below), observing
any "90-degree effects" (BEFORE the local eclipse arrives) seems
doubtful, based on this eclipse geometry ... but, we'll be recording anyway.
* * *
Pursuit of the staggering technological implications
of these simple torsion measurements -- for REAL “free energy”
… for REAL “anti-gravity” … for REAL “civilian
inheritance of the riches of an entire solar system …” –
are only outdone by the even more astonishing human implications
of developmentment and world-side distribution of these "HD/torsion
technologies" ... ranging from literal torsion “elimination
of disease” … to “total clean-up of the environment
of our entire planet” (including,
currently insoluble "nuclear nightmares -- like Chernobyl and Fukushima!)--
To radical, non-chemical “upgrades” to human
All hinging on the demonstrable “scientific
anomalies” -- and their extended, revolutionary implications --
we will be recording (for later presentation) during the May 20th Eclipse
… and the soon-to-follow, “Last Venus Transit of the 21st
Century,” June 6th ….
Clearly, the earlier Venus Event that we were fortunate
to observe at Coral Castle, in 2004, provided us with a priceless preview
of the stunning “physics anomalies” we can expect to share
this time with all those who have been edified by our unique research
for all these decades … now, coming to a fitting “climax”
in these remarkable Astronomical Events of 2012 ….
As noted earlier, the implications of “a fundamentally
new understanding of our ‘ultimate’ cosmic reality”
knows no bounds … for changing human beings on this planet
… if not as a means of physically "saving" planet Earth
The only impediment now standing in the way of
this crucial, “world-wide consciousness and technological revolution”
... is the democratized awareness—
That all of this is now scientifically -- if
not politically -- within our reach ….