By Richard C. Hoagland
with David Wilcock
© 2007 The Enterprise Mission
(Updated November 13, 2007)
Dear Enterprise Mission family, and interested new friends:
Lunar ruins? Intelligent artifacts? Deep mysteries? Impenetrable
secrets? The work of inscrutable forces we may never understand? NASA
cover-ups to suppress the truth... until the public is ready?
Are there really large, nearly-invisible
glass objects hiding in the background of some classic NASA shots from
the Apollo missions?
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007, we discussed
just that... at the National Press Club in Washington, DC!
Soon afterwards, our book on the subject,
Dark Mission, soared
to number 21 on the New York Times Bestseller List for Paperback Nonfiction.
Clearly, the word is getting out -- and people
are paying attention.
SHOW ME THE MONEY...
The next question everyone asks is "Where's
the beef?" -- to paraphrase another American corporate cliche'. Bear
in mind that there is no one single staggering, definitive picture that
drops everyone in their tracks. Our evidence suggests that NASA has tried
to ensure that none would get out.
What we do have, though, are some compelling
possibilities. At the very least, if you follow this article all the way
through, you will end up seeing very clear examples of image tampering
that our colleagues in Russia independently discovered.
Here is one intriguing case that escaped
NASA's censorship... brought to new life thanks to simple Photoshop techniques
to enhance brightness and contrast.
The mass you see in the above images is not
caused by a lens flare. The astronaut's shadow in the first three images
shows that the sun is coming in at a right angle to the camera
axis -- thus eliminating the potential for such a mundane explanation.
Lens flares require the light source to be
either in-frame or directly outside of it in order to illuminate the camera
lens. In this case, it is impossible to illuminate the lens, due to the
right-angle offset position of the sun.
Now let's take a closer look at the top two
frames of our comparison:
The top left shot, seen here once again,
is an original print -- saved from destruction by our senior Enterprise
Mission correspondent Dr. Ken Johnston.
The top right image is an enhancement of
Dr. Johnston's 'rescued' print -- lightened and contrast-enhanced -- showing
what you find buried in the emulsion of the black layers of the supposedly
airless lunar sky.
Three vertical geometric 'pillars' seem to
appear in the middle of the enhanced image, as well as a clearly obvious
'crossbar' up near the top.
Now let's go back to the bottom half of our
original comparison shot:
The bottom left image is an enhanced version
of the previous shot... only this time it's taken from NASA's own
version of the 40-year-old photograph, currently posted on official
As you can see, the detail has been sharply
diminished. The formerly blue 'comet-like' feature now seems red, due
to a long-term degradation in the emulsion of the photograph. The stunningly
regular geometry is also muted, leaving only the horizontal 'crossbar'
as a sharp geometric figure.
The image on the bottom right is where all
the magic is.
This is from an entirely different photograph,
taken from an entirely different angle!
This image was recorded when Alan Shepard
walked around, behind the LEM, and took another Hasselblad image looking
This image also can be found --
currently -- on official NASA websites!
Our next comparison shot, below, features
the original of the newly-discovered photo on the left -- as
well as our enhanced version on the right.
You can see one leg of the descent stage
of the lunar module, as Shepard now stands east of the landed spacecraft,
looking north. This same leg gets washed out when we enhance the image
on the right:
Dr. Edgar Mitchell, the astronaut, is no longer in the
shot. He is now out of frame, off to the left. However, the towering glass-like
ruins are still arching overhead, far to the north of the landed spacecraft.
The 'crossbar', and another horizontal feature below it, are both perfectly
visible -- again -- in the exact same places!
These unimaginably specific geometric details
are preserved between the two photographs. Two independent records --
both part of the official NASA archive -- both show the same extraordinary
objects, standing miles above the Moon!
Yet, the foreground between the two images is totally
different. One has an astronaut in it, and one features the leg of the
Just to help you visualize this with a physical example,
here are two different shots of the Washington Monument, showing two different
views in the foreground while the towering spire is clearly visible in
Now imagine the Monument was made entirely of crystal-clear
glass. It would blind you at the wrong angle, and at night it would be
hard to see it at all.
Since the Moon does not have an atmosphere, a towering
glass version of the Washington Monument would be difficult to see even
under the best of conditions.
NASA may have taken the game a step further, and deliberately
increased the blackness of the background in order to obscure
any remaining traces of the glass.
However, this trick was done 40 years ago... long before
someone could have imagined the advances that modern digital photo enhancement
As such, these images are a stunning official confirmation
of our entire Lunar dome hypothesis. You can go and find these images
-- the frame numbers listed above -- on the official NASA websites, or
the image DVDs they have been selling all over the world, and perform
the work yourself.
THE LINKS, PLEASE...
Just to make it simple, here is the link to the Apollo
Lunar Surface Journal, where these images can be found.
The "nasa.gov" in the link clearly establishes
this as an official government resource:
Here is a direct link to NASA's version of the first image
in our comparison -- the degraded 'official' example of the same shot
Dr. Johnston preserved:
Here is a direct link to the last image in our
comparision -- showing the same startlingly impossible geometry from an
entirely different vantage point on the lunar surface:
Even if this were our only example, it could change the
world. However, we have uncovered many startling examples just
The world is finally paying attention -- and contributing
their own findings to this growing body of research, as you are
about to see!
2001: JUST A WORK OF FICTION? OR...
Our journey may have started with
Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke, back in 1968. Was '2001' only
a work of fiction?
Present the truth as a sci-fi story and you have 'plausible
deniability'... while also whetting the public's appetite and imagination
for the idea that there could be "something" out there,
waiting to be found.
Or, perhaps we already did find it... and have
just been waiting for the right moment to reveal it publicly, without
creating socio-economic chaos:
[Scene from Clarke / Kubrick's "2001", featuring
rectangular "Monolith" found in a lunar crater]
'2001' also suggested that corresponding
anomalies may be found on Earth, dating back to the
dawn of humankind as we now know it:
Kubrick made a huge breakthrough in filmmaking with '2001'
-- redefining the state-of-the-art in storytelling and special
effects for its time.
Now, nearly 40 years later, fact is meeting fiction. The
push for a real, non-fiction disclosure has taken a quantum leap
forward with our publication of "Dark Mission" -- a comprehensive
exploration of the truth behind the mysteries:
Once standing like the mighty Monolith
itself, the first of potentially millions of looming dominoes
has now fallen.
The fallout is likely to change the face of the Earth
as we know it... and more importantly, that of the Moon.
* * *
If insiders are holding back the truth, you are
in control of how much longer the game will go on. All the evidence in
the world means nothing if no one pays attention.
Given that Dark Mission
is having explosive sales growth, rocketing up to the mid-20s range of
all books available for sale on Amazon.com (with a very impressive
announcement pending early next week...) your voice is being heard.
And you will not be ignored much longer.
NASA TRIES TO STOP THE BLEEDING... AND OPENS NEW
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007, Dr. Ken Johnston -- former
Manager of NASA's Data and Photo Control Department during the Apollo
program -- presented breakthrough evidence with me at the National Press
Club in Washington, DC.
Here are links for two mainstream media announcements
of our event to the international press -- hosted by Cheryll Jones, former
network news anchor for CNN:
Dr. Johnston was ordered to destroy key Apollo lunar images
and data in 1971... soon after the release of '2001'... rather
than to preserve them for academic and public study.
Johnston testified how he disobeyed these NASA orders,
and secretly saved the critical Apollo images—and the never-officially-published
lunar discoveries recorded on them.
According to AP, NASA is currently embroiled in a similar
controversy with Congress. The agency was planning to suppress a recent
study into aviation safety, and destroy the data.
However, due to overwhelming public pressure, NASA administrator
Michael Griffin just this week rescinded both these orders; the study
will be made public before the end of the year, according to Griffin --
and the data carefully preserved.
Our room in the National Press Club was built to comfortably
hold 40 people -- but that day it was packed to the bursting point.
We were surrounded by a wall-to-wall throng of both domestic
and international media, their microphones and cameras whirring. Here's
a picture from the front end of the crush:
The stakes were high. Exactly one week beforehand, Johnston
was abruptly terminated
from JPL's prestigious "Solar System Ambassador" program. His
four-year history with the program was duly 'sanitized' from
the official JPL SSA website.
The reason? Kay Ferrari, the program director, told Dr.
Johnston it was because he was “quoted [as] criticizing NASA in Hoagland’s
new book, ‘Dark Mission’”.
Her tip-off came from James Oberg, a former NASA contractor
now working for NBC News. Oberg was a colleague of Johnston’s at NASA’s
Manned Spacecraft Center during the Apollo Program in the 1970’s.
Kay Ferrari said Oberg raised “serious issues regarding
Johnston’s credentials” and his “crackpot accusations” against the agency.
And just like that, Dr. Johnston's career was ended.
A week later, we presented Johnson's real NASA
history, and allowed the international media to decide just how
'crackpot' his story really was.
The silence from our American print, online and broadcast
media has been deafening, but not unexpected.
The explosion of interest from our Russian friends, however,
has exceeded all our expectations.
FALSE STARTS AND 'NEGATIVE GREETINGS' CONFOUND
AMERICAN MEDIA EFFORTS
To be fair, a number of mainstream American press entities
-- such as the Washington Post -- did show up. They didn't actually write
anything, but they were obviously curious.
NBC Nightly News wanted to interview Ken and me for their
evening network news broadcast. Unfortunately, they wanted to conduct
the interview on MONDAY night, BEFORE the Tuesday press briefing.
One problem... we were literally sealed up in an aluminum
tube, helplessly suspended tens of thousands of feet above the Earth's
surface... headed from Albuquerque to Washington... during the very time
they wanted us!
So obviously, that didn't happen.
We also got a call from the producer of Bill O'Reilly's radio show November
1st, wanting us to appear. Then, "something" happened... and
it didn't take place after all. At least... not yet.
AN EXPLOSION OF PUBLICITY IN RUSSIAN MEDIA
The REAL coverage of our event, and our anomalous images
from the Moon, was NOT here in the United States -- but in RUSSIA!
FOUR of the major Russian television networks
(including TASS) turned up at the Press Club Tuesday morning, and taped
the entire two hours!
All four networks are running extensive pieces all over
the old Soviet Union now. We will eventually obtain this coverage on DVD,
as well as their raw footage -- and will make some of it available to
all of you.
This is something American networks NEVER intend for you
to see in the mainstream, as you have probably now guessed.
One Russian network -- "RTTV America
Inc." -- is the Russian equivalent of CNN.
RTTV did a THREE-HOUR private interview with Dr. Johnston
and me that evening in their downtown Washington studios on K street.
Their offices are in the AP building -- the Washington headquarters of
the Associated Press.
They will edit this down to "a 20 or 30-minute piece,"
according to the producer and the correspondent who interviewed us. They
tell us it will air "roughly a dozen times on Russian television
over the course of one day."
What day, you ask? According to our current information,
the Russian piece will air when the Space Shuttle touches down some time
All our Russian correspondents and producers are FASCINATED
by our revelations regarding "Kennedy, Khrushchev... and Apollo."
PUTIN' NASA IN ITS PLACE
The key question, of course, centers around Vladimir Putin,
the current Russian president. Putin recently declared he is sending Russia
to the Moon.
He offered the United States to jointly participate in
the mission... but the Bush Administration turned him down.
Given Putin's strong pressure to not only reach the Moon,
but establish a permanent Russian outpost there, the explosion of Russian
television and media coverage of our press conference on Tuesday might
not exactly be a "coincidence".
Let's not forget that Bush has already
anounced, in 2004, a "new Vision" for Americans to do exactly
the same thing.
It used to be said, when I lived and worked in Washington for NASA, that
"the shortest route to mainstream media attention in the US is via
We will see.
LIST OF RUSSIAN MAINSTREAM MEDIA LINKS
Unfortunately, the available translation utilities do
a dreadfully poor job, but as you peruse these links you can see for yourself
that our explosive NASA story is catching on like a wildfire in Russia.
This first link is from Pravda, considered a less-credible
Russian media outlet, but it happens to be the only coverage we've seen
so far in English:
Here are some links, in Russian, from their mainstream
media that you also can peruse:
Our next link
from the Russian CNews R&D includes a detailed Russian photographic
analysis of some of the new images. If you only click on one link in this
article, this is the one.
They have independently gone back to NASA photographs
-- located on official NASA websites -- and revealed the strange anomalies
that appear when you enhance the images.
The most provocative enhancement was discovered by the
Russians themselves... from an image directly off the "Great Images
in NASA" (GRIN) website, which first
went online Feb. 2nd, 2001... Groundhog Day:
The original, high-bandwidth download can be found at
-- and it shows what appears to be very clear evidence of air-brush tampering
to obscure some sort of lunar anomaly behind the astronaut.
The original just has an innocuous-looking black background,
but when the Russians did a simple enhancement, the result was much, much
This is just one of three new examples dug up by the Russians.
The second example shows what appears to be another primitive
NASA technique for "doctoring" an image to hide unwanted features.
At this time, you can still download a super-hi-res version of it at http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/MEDIUM/GPN-2000-001131.jpg.
Rather than an airbrush, a simple enhancement seems to
show razor-blade marks from a strip of the picture that was sliced and
pasted three times in a row, directly over something NASA doesn't want
you to see:
Young Internet mavericks should remember... this was 40
years ago, long before Photoshop.
Anyone doing print layout work got very good at using
a razor blade to quite literally slice a desired image out of its background
in the source photograph. You physically remove the piece you want, and
throw away the rest of the print.
Look at old magazines or movie posters and you can see
how the lines around someone's hair are too smooth and clean -- due to
the action of the razor blade. It took a great hand to make those curves
come out so natural-looking:
Therefore, such a 'cutout' technique would be one of several
quick-and-dirty methods of editing anomalies out of a photograph. Here's
Print three extra photographs off of the offending negative.
Stack them perfectly on top of each other and tape them down to your desktop.
Find a black strip next to the area you need to get rid of, so the colors
match as precisely as possible, and slice it out.
Now you have freed up three equal black strips, from each
of the three photographs in your stack.
Go back to the original and paste your strips in over
the image, just where you need them. Eyeball it to make sure no one will
ever be able to tell.
Look closely. White lines start at the top left of the
next image and continue appearing all the way down to the bottom right.
Whatever we're covering up here, it's BIG.
Looks good. Done!
Again... (grin)... no one imagined that a technology like
Photoshop image enhancement would ever exist in those days!
Wouldn't you then want to get rid of all but one copy
of your photographs, so you wouldn't have to either re-do this work five
times in a row or risk getting caught with your pants down?
Thank you, Dr. Johnston, for disobeying a direct order!
The possibility that something else was hiding in this
picture is raised by looking at the official Russian enhancement of the
entire shot. A clear anomaly can be seen above the lunar lander:
It makes sense that NASA would be interested in these
anomalies if they had already been spotted prior to the manned missions.
That might explain why such oddities are seen in the backgrounds of lunar
landing sites. Wouldn't you want to know?
And if you still believe this is all just BS, why has
there been a complete blackout of any and all of the data we
discussed at the National Press Club in the American mainstream media?
And why end Dr. Johnston's exemplary career over it?
This Russian article already has over 100 comments posted
to it as we publish this piece. Although some diehard 'debunkers' will
remain in denial long after the burden of proof has been repeatedly
satisfied, most of the Russian comments are taking it very seriously:
Our next detailed, three-part Russian article includes
a seven-part photographic analysis by an indigenous Ukranian astronomer,
specializing in potential extraterrestrial lunar artifacts:
Here is a translation of the official Russian coverage
And, just as we go to press, the popular Russian newspaper
"Moskovskij Komsomolets" has asked us for an exclusive
interview with new photographs and comments. More to come!
INTERVIEW WITH API NEWS IN RUSSIA
Lastly, Ken Johnston received a series of questions this
morning from Vladimir Yaduta of the API News International Department
in Russia -- regarding detailed responses to questions raised at our Tuesday
Here are API's original Russian questions in translated
English, followed by Ken's replies:
•Apollo Mission photos, which exploded so much hoax
and drastic discussion, again draw broad attention (in the light of
Dark Mission project). What's the true origin of the photos?
Ans.: These are official NASA Apollo images, as I stated
at the NPC, that came from my office in NASA's Lunar Receiving Laboratory
in 1971. The photo prints were processed in the NASA photo lab at the
Manned Space Center (currently Johnson Space Center), and personally
delivered to me.
•How come that nobody noticed the evidence of strange
artifacts that lead to the exterrestrial life?
Ans.: There have been lots of individuals who have raised
questions about strange formations on the moon, but very few people
take them seriously. This is due to NASA using professional “debunkers”
who attack the person making the claims, or offer other mundane explanations.
Check out <lunaranomalies.com>
for additional examples of other lunar artifacts.
•You were told to destroy the original photos. What
was the reason for such a move?
Ans.: I was never given a good reason for why I was
to destroy the original photos. Remember, I was archiving 5 complete
sets from each Apollo mission, which at that point totaled nine manned
missions to the Moon, from Apollo 8 through Apollo 16.
I was instructed to destroy 4 sets from each mission,
leaving only one per mission to be archived. Since there were nine total
Apollo missions at that point, this equates to 36 full sets of photographs
and data I was instructed to destroy. The only explanation I was given
was that they were taking up too much storage space (approximately 12
•NASA is known to be a rather secret organization.
Are there many secrets yet to be revealed? How closely does NASA cooperate
with the defence ministries?
Ans.: NASA must cooperate with the Department of Defense
in the United States. According to the National
Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, Section 305… (i):
…The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
shall be considered a Defense Agency of the United States for the
purpose of Chapter 17, Title 35 of the United States code ….
Section 206… (d):
NO [NASA] information which has been classified for
reasons of National Security shall be included in any report made
under this section [of the act]…”
As to your question of “are there many secrets yet to
be revealed,” I can only say that considering how NASA was organized
at the time I worked on Apollo, and the fact that we have discovered
these anomalies only after decades, logic dictates there must be more.
Perhaps many more.
•There have been much discussion over Mars programmes
for the past years. Why attention shifted to the Moon again?
Ans.: It took over four (4) years for Hoagland and Bara
to write the book “Dark Mission,” while all the time people were focused
on Mars. Now that the book is out in public, everyone is looking at
the Moon; however, they have also revealed lots of artifacts on Mars
as well -- also suppressed by NASA.
[From Richard C. Hoagland: The larger question, of course,
is why the international community is suddenly stampeding back to the
Moon after 30 years of totally ignoring it. We feel the ultimate answer
lies in the artifacts that have been covered up, and are lying in wait
for others to reveal them.]
•Space has always been terra incognita. The search
for the so-called 12th planet, which has been described by Zecharia
Sitchin, is on the agenda. Is it still actual today, from your point
Ans.: I am not sure that I understand the question.
If you are asking me if there is still interest in searching for the
twelfth planet, I would have to say that the search continues in other
organizations besides “The Enterprise Mission.”
•Which issues are most crucial today and really
deserve scrutiny of the space agencies?
Ans.: I have always said that “FULL DISCLOSURE” by the
space agencies is necessary, so that new science can be utilized to
further man’s search for life in outer space.
•American shuttles still experience various technical
problems. How are these problems being solved?
Ans.: The American Space Shuttle fleet is getting very
old, and more problems seem to be surfacing with each mission. In my
opinion, NASA will just continue to “work around” these problems until
the International Space Station is complete, and the shuttle fleet is
shut down -- i.e. “grounded.”
•Space universe attracts many governments, including
China, USA, Russia, India. From your point of view, who may take the
leading role in the new space race?
Ans.: It is my opinion that the USA and Russia must
join together for a joint effort to re-establish man’s presence -- not
only on the Moon, but also on Mars.
Commander David Bowman, the heroic figure in 2001, was
led into a fantastic journey of consciousness evolution by the Monolith
they discovered on the Moon.
Could this be a predictive glance of the world-changing
effect that this knowledge will have on each person once this suppressed
truth is finally allowed to see the light of day?
Will the shackles of our collective ignorance be broken
in an epiphany of understanding and fellowship of humanity, as we realize
that our petty internecine struggles are overshadowed by a much older
and far more interesting history?
Now is the time we have been waiting for. An ever-increasing
momentum has been started, and with your continued enthusiasm and support,
the Secrecy Curtain can be broken -- just like the Iron Curtain was shattered
nearly two decades ago.
UPDATE NOVEMBER 13, 2007:
DISCLOSURE MOMENTUM IS SKYROCKETING!
Enterprise Mission has always focused on
physical, hard evidence of apparent ruins on other satellites in our Solar
System. Mars was our original focus, and is still the most intriguing
set of anomalies on our radar.
If we can see it, photograph it, measure
it and ultimately visit it in person, then we're very interested.
For this same reason, we have avoided discussing
the UFO issue, as it is ephemeral by its very nature. There may be eyewitness
reports, anomalous radiation readings, landing traces, photos, videos,
et cetera, but there is no place on Earth where an alleged ET craft sits
and waits to be photographed, visited and studied at our leisure...
...At least none the public has any access
Nonetheless, within two weeks of our National
Press Club debriefing of the world media, the 'disclosure' effort has
suddenly taken a HUGE leap forward. Multiple fronts are bursting forth,
all at the same time.
It's almost like something's getting ready
to happen. Like something IS happening!
Tell your friends. Fence-sitting time is
over. Someone seems to have decided that kindergarten is over...
and it's time for us to graduate into the 'first grade' of what is really
REICH: SUDDENLY NOT SO RIDICULED
The first inkling of 'leaks' happening, possibly
as a result of our conference, occurred just four days after
we spoke at the National Press Club.
this link, you can read a Boston.com article about Wilhelm Reich,
a contemporary of Freud who made early discoveries of hyperdimensional
'torsion fields' in action.
Reich also demonstrated the "orgone"
fields' intriguing -- and supportive -- connections with biological life,
including healing effects:
It is now open, public knowledge that the
US government came down on Reich with such force that he was imprisoned,
his books burned and his life ended while he was under incarceration.
Call it coincidence or synchronicity, but
Reich ordered that his remaining -- and quite extensive -- files be kept
sealed and secret for precisely 50 years after his death.
Those 50 years just spontaneously ended...
four days after we held our press conference, ( ! ), where we
documented similar -- and very current -- NASA attempts to destroy Ken
Johnston's career and suppress breakthrough information:
years after his death, supporters promote scientist's work
By Jerry Harkavy, Associated Press Writer | November 3, 2007
RANGELEY, Maine --It was 50 years ago that physician-scientist
Wilhelm Reich, best known for his discovery of a purported cosmic life
force associated with sexual orgasm, died in federal prison, his books
burned and his equipment destroyed by the government.
Ridiculed at the time, the European-born
psychiatrist is today largely forgotten and his work on what he called
orgone energy remains outside the scientific mainstream.
But a small number of scientists and other believers
are working to advance his studies -- and resurrect his reputation.
"Personally, I think it's going to be a long time
before all of his work is understood and recognized," said Reich's
granddaughter, Renata Reich Moise, a nurse-midwife and artist in the
coastal town of Hancock.
Reich died on Nov. 3, 1957, in a federal prison in Lewisburg,
Pa., where he was sent for ignoring an injunction obtained by the Food
and Drug Administration that outlawed his orgone energy accumulator.
The 50th anniversary of his death is being marked by
a major exhibition on Reich and his work that opens Nov. 15 at the Jewish
Museum in Vienna, the city where he attended medical school, began his
psychiatric practice and studied under Sigmund Freud.
In New Jersey, the American College of Orgonomy, which
provides training and research support for physicians and others interested
in Reich and his legacy, scheduled a conference and dinner to coincide
with the anniversary.
Also this month, archives comprised of nearly 300 boxes
of Reich's unpublished papers that were placed in storage at the Countway
Library at Harvard Medical School will become available to researchers
for the first time.
Before going to prison, Reich directed in his will that
the scientific papers, journals and diaries only be opened 50 years
after his death.
He also specified that his laboratory at the 175-acre
site he dubbed Orgonon that overlooks Rangeley Lake be converted to
In Rangeley, where Reich spent his latter years, scientists
and doctors from the U.S. and Europe gathered this summer for a conference
that explored the prospects of seeking FDA approval for clinical trials
of orgone accumulator blankets to treat burn victims.
Reich is described by the American Psychoanalytic Association
as "one of the most brilliant, creative and controversial of the
pioneering analysts." He was the first to focus on character analysis
rather than neurotic symptoms.
[Reich] linked a healthy sex life, which he called "orgastic
potency," to emotional wellness, believing that failure to discharge
sexual energy resulted in neurotic disorders.
His more controversial work came after he veered away
from psychotherapy into laboratory experiments in Norway that led to
the discovery of what he called "bions" -- basic life forms
that gave off orgone energy.
Unfortunately, the article fails to mention
why 'bions' are so important. Namely, Reich believed these spontaneous
energy emissions were responsible for the creation of life... from previously
This was not just a supposition. Reich was
one of the first to investigate and document potential proof
for this hypothesis in the laboratory -- and his successors have continued
to demonstrate the same effects, under the strictest conditions.
And that brings us to our next point...
FOX NEWS PROMOTES LIFE ON MARS!
If we couldn't produce the link, you'd never
believe us, so here it is... fresh off the 'presses' from earlier today:
Fox News is now officially 'seeding' the
idea of life on other planets!
Bear in mind... not only did we just break
into worldwide media headlights with evidence of ruins on the Moon, but
Reich has suddenly gained mainstream credibility as well -- and his discoveries
go a long way towards proving that "wherever there is water,
there will be life".
NASA has repeatedly made statements connecting
water with life over the years, without giving any scientific clarification.
Hoagland is rarely, if ever, given credit for being the first to propose
the idea that a primitive, algae-type form of life may be found on Europa.
Admittedly, this Fox article is still just
a toe in the water, as the experiment only demonstrates the possibility
that this could work... but once you put it in context, the meaning
More 'leaks' will soon follow... and we may
even have a real gusher on our hands here:
on Earth May Have Come From Mars
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
H.G. Wells might not have been
that far off when he wrote about aliens from Mars coming to Earth.
"It may not be likely," NASA researcher David
Morrison told National Geographic News, "but we cannot
exclude the possibility that we are, in effect, all Martians."
[Of course, Enterprise Mission has been saying "We
are the Martians" for many years now. Traces of a primordial
human civilization clearly appear to exist on the surface of Mars,
as well as the Moon.]
Panspermia, or the idea that Earth was "seeded"
by life from outer space, is centuries old but until lately has not
had much scientific evidence to support it.
But a European experiment last month demonstrates that
microscopic life could indeed survive inside rocks hurtling through
A team led by John Parnell from the University of Aberdeen
in Scotland embedded fossilized microbes into a fake meteorite strapped
to the exterior of the Russian Foton M3 scientific-research
probe, which went into orbit on Sept. 26 and came back to Earth 12 days
"In the bit of rock we got back, some biological
compounds have survived," Parnell told National Geographic News.
The large number of rocks from Mars that end up on Earth
lends credence to the hypothesis that terrestrial life may have
had its origin on the Red Planet, which 4 billion years ago was much
more hospitable than Earth was at the same time. (emphasis
Notice how the Russians were responsible for
this experiment -- which occurred with the help of one of their space
Notice also how the wording of the article inspires far
more hope, imagination and insight than the actual scientific 'meat' in
it, which is quite tame compared to what's really out there. Nonetheless,
it defeats any skeptic who would suggest that any and all bacteria automatically
die if they're inside a meteorite.
This article is intended to seed the imagination -- get
people thinking outside the box -- and expand our ideas of what is possible.
Nonetheless, if it's 'meat' you want, it's 'meat' you're
getting... particularly as we head into these next chunks of data!
DISCLOSURE TAKES AN INCREDIBLE LEAP
Yesterday, November 12, 2007, a group of
top military and government witnesses -- headed by former Arizona governor
Fife Symington -- assembled at the National Press Club.
This event, financed by the Sci Fi Network,
occurred almost precisely two weeks after our own... before there was
any chance of the momentum for disclosure dying down.
Symington and crew delivered a formal presentation
to the world's media regarding their personal knowledge and experience
with the UFO phenomenon.
And guess what... our old buddies and pals
at Fox News have given it full coverage, among many other media entities
who are finally deciding to pull their heads out of the sand!
Skeptics should bear in mind that there is
not a single titter, joke, slur of any kind in this piece... not even
the slightest whiff of sarcasm, scorn, or slander. It is totally up-front,
straight ahead and matter of fact.
And it's FOX! ... arguably
the closest thing we've got to a direct mouthpiece for the United States
The best way to rally public support around
an issue like this is to get them thinking THEY are the ones who want
to hear about it.
This is much stronger -- and safer -- than
if they think YOU are the one who has decided it's time to tell them the
Urge Government to Investigate UFOs
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
It's time for the government to resume
investigating UFOs, a group of former air pilots and other noteworthy
officials told reporters Monday.
Former Arizona Gov. Fife Symington, who claims to have
seen a UFO in 1997, led the panel at the National Press Club in Washington,
"We want the U.S. government to stop perpetuating
the myth that all UFOs can be explained away in down-to-earth, conventional
terms," said Symington, according to Agence France-Presse.
He called for the reopening of Project Blue Book, the
Air Force's 18-year probe of UFO sightings, which was shut down in 1969
for lack of evidence.
Several pilots described their own encounters with UFOs.
"Nothing in my training prepared me for what we
were witnessing," said retired Air Force Sgt. James Penniston,
who said he saw and touched one while stationed in England.
The triangular craft had "blue and yellow lights
swirling around the exterior," and was "warm to the touch
and felt like metal."
The panel was sponsored by the Coalition for Freedom
of Information, a group that agitates for public release of government
information about UFOs and which has ties to cable television's SciFi
• Click on the highlighted phrases to read reports by
"RODDENBERRY'S LAW" IS
NOW IN EFFECT
As my old colleague Gene Roddenberry once
exclaimed, "if it's real, then why don't I see it on TV?"
Roddenberry's Law was satisfied for Symington's
press conference. Larry King devoted an entire episode of his show to
Again, except for the very beginning of the
show, where there was a tongue-in-cheek quip against Shirley McLaine,
the entire program was straightforward, serious and supportive.
The skeptic who was brought in towards the
end was a laughingstock, in this case. His arguments seemed utterly absurd
in the face of the expert testimony that was being given.
Google is shooting down copies of this video
like Cheney on a quail hunt, so don't be surprised if you have to do a
bit of searching!
to Larry King video
As you have just seen, serious mainstream
media coverage of the event is taking place -- even from such notably
biased entities as Fox News.
This strongly suggests that Hoagland
and Johnston's break into American television media coverage on the lunar
ruins issue will soon follow.
The likelihood of such a break would be catapulted
much further if there were new evidence that Russia will push for such
Hmm... let's see...
RUSSIA AND CHINA ANNOUNCE MOON RACE:
JUST A COINCIDENCE?
Now get this. On the very same day this
"Disclosure" conference was held, Russia and India announced
a joint mission... to the Moon!
This only happened, of course, after Putin
offered the same deal to the US, only to be flatly turned down:
The leaders of veteran allies Russia and
India agreed Monday to launch a joint unmanned mission to the moon during
Kremlin talks on boosting military and trade ties.
Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh announced
the plan after talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, during which
the two discussed projects for a more than twofold increase in trade
by the end of the decade.
"The symbol of our cooperation is the joint agreement
to send an unpiloted space ship to the moon for scientific investigation,"
Singh said in comments broadcast on Russian state television after the
Russia's space agency Roskosmos said it had signed an
agreement with the Indian space agency for joint lunar exploration through
2017, including the construction of a module that will orbit the moon
"for peaceful purposes."
"Russia and India will jointly build a space ship.
Under the project we plan to send an entire laboratory to the moon,"
Roskosmos head Anatoly Perminov said in a statement...
The deals "open new prospects for our scientific,
technical and production cooperation in sensitive areas,"
Putin said. (emphasis added)
Hmm... "cooperation in sensitive areas."
Very, very interesting indeed.
Stay tuned... there are other developments
brewing that we are not yet authorized to disclose.
Well, we could tell you, but then
we'd have to... you know.