MOMENTUM IS BUILDING IN THE RUSSIAN MAINSTREAM MEDIA
The repercussions of our National Press Club event (see Part One) have been beyond our wildest expectations.
This is NOT a story that briefly pops up, long enough to inspire the few who are open-minded enough to care, only to burrow back down into the cold, stony grave of media blackout.
Instead, Russia is CONTINUING to "run with the ball". Our publicity is actually INCREASING, not decreasing, as time goes on!
This very much suggests that a political initiative is building, and at this point we're only seeing the beginning stages of it. We have waited a long time for this day!
In this update, we are releasing even MORE images, some of which we have never before published, to help further increase the momentum and publicity for this story in the Russian media... and to inspire more of you to look for new anomalies in the Moon photographs, as this is just the beginning.
Though the production quality is amateur, the mainstream Russian newspaper "Moskovsky Komsomolets", or 'MK', has already put together a YouTube video, in English, documenting our research for their online readers:
In case you have trouble watching this video, the direct link is:
Here is a link to the article, all in Russian, where this video can be found -- and notice the increasing weight of comments from the public coming in:
Here is another article from MK, in Russian, that goes into detail about our research:
We've also found out that our story is breaking into the Russian newspapers. Newsru.com is said to be THE major online Russian news resource:
Komsomolskaya Pravda is one of the most popular daily newspapers in Russia:
Here is a scan of the MK newspaper from November 21st, 2007, which we linked to above... and as you can see, we made the front-page story:
UPDATE: THE "MOON CRISIS" CONTINUES INCREASING...
Now, as of November 26, 2007, even MORE publicity is coming out. Perhaps even more interestingly, CNews, Russia's IT review, is now calling this NASA's "Moon Crisis".
At this time, the images at the bottom of this article do not seem to match the ones under discussion... so we have inserted what appear to be the correct ones. Both of these images were independently discovered by our Russian colleagues:
As this new article goes on -- Part Two in our series -- you will find even more links to places where you can start downloading your own hi-resolution Moon photos, making basic adjustments like Brightness, Contrast and Curves in Photoshop, and find even more potentially unexpected treasures.
Of course, we will give you proper credit for your discoveries -- as we did with these two images first published in the CNews R&D blog. You are about to see even more shocking new images as we move forward.
If you are a member of the Russian media, remember that the more you publicize this story, the more it will force NASA to respond.
We do not wish anyone to lose their jobs or be humiliated... we are simply proving to NASA, and those who control it, that the people are not only ready for the truth -- we demand it.
FROM THE MOUTHS OF TRANSLATORS...
And, below this e-mail is our Russian translator's English overview of what the Russian "Moskovsky Komsomolets" newspaper series actually says. It is clear to see that our case is receiving favorable coverage:
INEVITABLE EDITS WILL OCCUR...
Before we head into the original Q&A that formed the meat of this article, our translator also found one instance where my original text was heavily edited down into a simplified form.
Here you will see the edited version. Right after this, our article heads into the full, unaltered Q&A... and towards the end, you will find the original source text that this came from.
My co-author for this article series, David Wilcock, has written the single most comprehensive, distilled summary of Kozyrev's fascinating findings at this link. It has been reprinted in NEXUS magazine and other sources, including the German version of NEXUS, slated for February 2008.
Wilcock shows how Kozyrev's astonishing, simple experiments lead to new insights about gravity, matter, energy and consciousness. He believes Russia has discovered the science that can and will save our planet, if we act quickly enough.
Wilcock is writing and producing a Hollywood movie to educate the world about consciousness science, entitled CONVERGENCE. He has already been approached by scientists and media from Russia and other countries, and has tested a working prototype of a Russian "torsion field" generator.
Enterprise Mission also is producing a documentary film about the Moon Crisis, due for release next year, to help support the outrageous success of "Dark Mission," which is holding steady on the New York Times Bestseller List.
Q&A BETWEEN 'MK' AND RICHARD C. HOAGLAND
And now, the moment we've been waiting for... the actual
Q&A "Moskovsky Komsomolets" sent to me, along with my answers.
This is where the real 'meat' of our article comes into play, as much
of this content was edited down for publication:
MK: What do you think of a widespread
opinion, that the USA have [sic] never been on the Moon and that the shots
of American cosmonaut[s] on the Moon are made in a film studio?
Based on what I personally witnessed there, I strongly
now believe that NASA itself began the lie "we never went to the
Moon" -- as ultimate insurance against anyone someday asking "what
did NASA REALLY discover on the Moon?!"
Namely, it appears that military astronauts were specifically
sent to the Moon by NASA -- with secret orders to report on and bring
back priceless, ancient ET technology they found there. These were intended
to be used for later classified analysis and "back-engineering"
by NASA and the US government.
Ken described then how he had been instructed by his NASA superiors to destroy these images during the Apollo Program. He presented to the press, at that time, some of the classified Apollo photographs themselves which, against official orders, he had carefully preserved.
These photographs, in fact, showed blatant "lunar ET ruins."
These new high-resolution images overwhelmingly confirm exactly what Ken Johnston was trying to tell everyone back in 1996.
We have only barely scratched the surface of what must be out there. We are increasingly getting emails from people who are studying the images and finding new things just by making slight adjustments in Photoshop, such as brightness and contrast or Curves.
Here is one of the stunning examples we only recently discovered, which came from Apollo 17.
Some people might want to quibble about the color contrasts in the lunar sky, and that's fine. Even though there is no acceptable natural explanation for these straight-line formations appearing, it's easier to dismiss as a "what if"...
However, look more closely. The long, thin rod-shaped girder, lying aginst the side of the mountain, is about as direct, distinct and unnatural as you could ever ask for:
Now remember. If the dark, straight lines in the full-width image ARE actually part of a glass structure, then you might very well see support girders or pillars holding it up.
What would happen if one of those support struts -- well over a mile in length -- broke off from a meteor hit, and toppled over, landing against the mountainside? Would it bend against the mountain before finally coming to rest, as we see in the picture?
Would the sunlight then capture it at a different angle, so that if your camera were positioned properly, you'd get a bright reflection? You might not get such a glare from the rest of the surrounding glass structure, as it would be largely invisible to the naked eye unless the light were at the perfect angle.
Before dismissing this as a manipulated image, skeptics should remember that this image can be found directly here:
In case you don't have the patience or desire to look for new anomalies and send us the results, you can link directly to the above image here... and see the bizarre anomalies, including the fallen 'cable', for yourself:
Oberg got Dr. Johnston dismissed from his volunteer position in a current JPL educational program, strictly because of his public testimony in "Dark Mission."
Oberg felt that Dr. Johnston was criticizing NASA’s actions during and after the Apollo missions, and convinced Dr Johnston's boss, Kay Ferrari, to immediately fire him and remove all traces of his service from the public record online.
Any further examples of harassment, threats or intimidation
towards either Dr. Johnston or me would simply politically confirm what
we've been saying for eleven years:
We do know that NASA's so-called "Brookings Report" officially predicted "lunar ET ruins" could be discovered. [Look at the second full paragraph up from the bottom of this next image.] This report was published prior to the Kennedy-Khruschev meetings.
You can clearly see this New York Times article dated as December 15, 1960:
However, just two weeks after making this announcement, the President privately met up with Premier Khruschev at their first Vienna Summit... and suggested that both nations "go to the Moon together!"
And, the official White House documents and memos we cite in "Dark Mission" support the fact that the President kept repeating his offer... across several years of secret background talks and negotiations!
This included a highly public statement, in which
Kennedy offered the same proposal -- namely of a "joint cooperation
on a US/Soviet lunar mission" -- at the United Nations, on September
On or about November 12, 1963 -- after literally
years of turning the President down -- the Soviet Premier finally
accepted President Kennedy's offer of "a joint Moon mission."
How else can one rationally explain this: Two major geopolitical
enemies come within “a hair's-breadth of annihilating the human race in
a nuclear war” in the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. Then suddenly, just
a year later, they agree to JOINTLY forsake the highly public "Moon
race" ... and go to the Moon together!
We DO cite specific examples of apparent highly advanced original lunar technology (i.e. "C3-P0's head"), discovered on our examination of official, published NASA Apollo images.
Such a technology could have been returned to Earth and "back engineered" by NASA over the more than 40 years that have elapsed since the Apollo Program ended.
Whether this back engineering took place, and whether it has led to "military applications," is at present total speculation.
However, sadly, most technological discoveries in history have been converted to various military uses at some point in their development. Consider the Wright Brothers' airplane or Einstein's nuclear energy.
So, despite all the peaceful uses such wondrous ET technologies
could dramatically advance, we must also seriously consider the possibility
that they have been used for military purposes.
It appears that what we have been able to publicly reveal from official NASA data is, in fact, only a small part of an even greater, ancient, long-lost human civilization.
Our evidence suggests this civilization spread all
across the entire solar system at one time. This evidence includes
ancient ruins we have scientifically investigated on the planet Mars.
Other official NASA data, which also has been long-suppressed,
makes the case.
I believe this might be the old "Atlantis" -- which (among other capabilities) may have possessed the technology of going to the Moon many thousands (if not millions) of years ago from Earth.
They may then have built the amazing glass-like ruins
we still can see there, in the long-hidden NASA data.
Is this ancient Egyptian myth actually a badly-preserved fragment of real pre-history?
Did our ancestors come back from the Moon to civilize
later generations of humans that had devolved (for some reason...)
and were still living here on Earth?
We do this by going back to the Moon in cooperation,
not as rivals ... just as President Kennedy and Premiere Khrushchev
wanted to do so many years ago, before they both were stopped!
Ultimately, they proved that gravity CAN be "engineered,"
i.e. controlled. We document this in Chapter Two of "Dark
This is in sharp contrast to the Soviets' masterful control
of their spacecraft trajectories to the Moon and other planets, from the
beginning of their exploration program.
This toy, in itself, proves that there MUST be a "hidden
physics" for successfully getting to the Moon and other planets.
Otherwise, no nation’s space probes -- Russians or Americans -- would
ever reach their targets!
Were it not now for other, invisible "whistle blowers"
inside NASA, who have apparently heeded our calls, and have begun their
own voluminous release of hundreds of high-quality, scanned Apollo images
of what's REALLY on the Moon, we would not be having this discussion!
Later, when I attempted to secure hard copies of these amazing Soviet images for detailed analysis, my representative in Moscow was literally pulled into a room at the old Soviet Academy of Sciences building... and told pointedly to "stop looking."
It has also been a lie that was willingly supported by
former Soviet governments as well!
He too was opposed by powerful and secret forces, who did not want ANY public revelations of WHY the US and the USSR, for one brief moment, had agreed to JOINTLY go to the Moon.