Which returns us to the Sun.
There is a very well-known, long-period, and still mysterious variability
associated with the largest "hyperdimensional gate" in our own neighborhood
-- our "local" star, the Sun.
Its complex changes, which include a host of related
surface phenomena -- solar flares, coronal disturbances, mass ejections,
etc. -- is termed "the sunspot cycle" ... because the number
of simultaneous "spots" (lower-temperature vortices appearing "dark"
against the hotter solar surface, as this activity occurs -- left) waxes
and wanes over about 11 years. (The full magnetic reversal of the Sun's
polarity takes two complete sunspot cycles to return to "zero" -- thus
the complete "solar cycle" is about 20 years.)
In the 1940's, the Radio Corporation of America (RCA)
hired a young electrical engineer -- John Nelson -- in an effort to
improve the reliability of HF ("short-wave") radio communications around
Earth. Such radio transmissions had been observed to be, for some reason,
more reliable in the "lulls" in between, than during solar activity
associated with "peak" sunspot years.
To his surprise, Nelson soon specifically correlated
this rising and falling radio interference with not only sunspot cycle,
but with the motions of the
major planets of the solar system; he found, to his increasing astonishment,
a very repeatable -- in essence, astrological correlation ...
between the inexorable orbits of all the planets (but especially, Jupiter,
Saturn, Uranus and Neptune -- which, remember, hold essentially all
the solar's system's known angular momentum) ... and major radio-disturbing
eruptions on the Sun!
The Hyperdimensional Model finally provides a comprehensive
theoretical explanation -- a "linking mechanism" -- for these, to a
lot of astronomers, still embarrassing decades-old RCA observations.
For, in essence what John Nelson had rediscovered was nothing
short of a "Hyperdimensional
Astrology" -- the ultimate, very ancient, now highly demonstrable
angular momentum foundations behind the real influences
of the Sun and planets on our lives ...
For, as part of his solar research, Nelson also "rediscovered"
something else ...
"It is worthy of note that in 1948 when Jupiter
and Saturn were spaced by 120 degrees, and solar activity
was at a maximum, radio signals averaged of far higher
quality for the year than in 1951 with Jupiter and Saturn
at 180 degrees and a considerable decline in solar activity.
In other words, the average quality curve of radio signals
followed the cycle curve between Jupiter and Saturn rather
than the sunspot curve ... [emphasis added]."
-- J.H. Nelson, "Planetary
Position Effect on
Short-Wave Signal Quality"
(Electrical Engineering, May 1952)
These decades-old observations are very telling ... not only
confirming Jupiter and Saturn as the primary "drivers" behind the
Sun's known cycle of activity (in the HD Model), but strongly implying
an additional direct effect of their changing angular relationship on
the electrical properties of Earth's ionosphere. This, of course, is
totally consistent with these changing planetary geometries affecting
not just the Sun, but the other planets as well ... just as
"conventional" astrologers have claimed -- via Maxwell's "changing
scalar potentials"...
Therefore, at this point, only the hyperdimensional theory--
1) Points to the (literally!) deepest implications of
the simple astronomical fact that the "tail wags the
dog"-- that the planets in this physics are fully capable
of exerting a determinant influence on the Sun -- and
each other -- through their disproportionate ratio of
total solar system angular momentum ... over 100 to 1,
in the [known!] planets' favor.
Only the Hyperdimensional Model--
2) Possesses the precise physical mechanism -- via
Maxwell's "changing quaternion scalar potentials"
-- accounting for this "anomalous" planetary angular
momentum influence.
And, only the HD theory--
3) Has already publicly identified, at the United Nations, in 1992, a blatant
geometric clue to this entire HD solar process: the maximum
sunspot numbers (those large, relatively "cool," rotating vortices
appearing on the solar surface), rising and falling and methodically
changing latitude, during the course of the familiar 22-year solar
cycle--
And peaking every half-cycle (~11 years), at the hyperdimensionally-significant
solar latitude of ~ "19.5 degrees!"
Furthermore, recent discoveries via the indirect technique
of "helioseismology" (optical monitoring of sound waves vibrating back
and forth within the Sun), have revealed another clear solar "hyper-dimensional
signature at play; a curious "jet," flowing around the north pole several
thousand miles below the visible solar surface; the remarkable similarity
to an equivalent phenomenon discovered by Voyager flowing around
the north pole of Saturn -- a "polar
hexagon" in the clouds -- even to the latitude, seems just
a bit "too coincidental." 
Unfortunately, because the discovery is not based on
direct imaging (as with Voyager), but on an indirect "sub-surface
flow" technique, the investigators have rounded off the corners of the
potential sub-surface "solar
hexagon"; in fact, they should consult more frequently with their
NASA planetary colleagues for additional examples of this geometric,
now clearly hyperdimensional "flow pattern" elsewhere in the
solar system ...
The increasing identification of the hyperdimensional
mechanism underlying the Sun's primary energy production has, unfortunately,
brought with it certain inevitable, potentially disquieting predictions
...
Described first by Kepler as his "Third Law," the farther
out a planet orbits from its star the longer is its period of revolution.
Since we're talking about possible additional planets driving
this entire Hyperdimensional Solar Process (see again angular momentum
diagram, above) -- planets that must be hundreds of times farther
from the Sun than Earth (Pluto is "only" 40 times its distance, and
orbits in "only" about 250 years) -- the "years" of these extremely
distant worlds could equal thousands if not tens of thousands
of Earth's year ... depending on their orbits. Because of these immense
orbital periods, the cycles of solar energy production driven by their
combined angular momentum will also be v-e-r-y long, indeed--
Perhaps as long as ~26,000 years ... (remember that number).
Also remember that such distant planets -- even if not
particularly massive -- will have a disproportionately large effect
on the total solar HD energy generation, because of the enormous "leverage"
in the angular momentum equation with increasing distance. Thus, these
still undiscovered worlds must in fact account for most of the
solar energy we see ... depending on the actual orbital periods; the
repeated ultra-long-term phasings of their orbits -- creating equally
long-term angular momentum resonances in the Sun -- must produce resulting
long-term cyclic changes in the Sun's total luminosity ... lasting
literally thousands of years ... far longer than the short-term,
historical "sunspot cycle" Nelson first linked directly to the known
members of the solar system.
There is already a well-known link, between the historical 11-year "sunspot
cycle" -- increased solar flares, x-ray emission, frequency of "coronal
mass ejections," etc. -- and a measurable (if inexplicable as yet) increase
in total solar energy production. Misnamed "the
solar constant," this cyclic increase and decrease (according to
satellite measurements) is curiously in phase with the current
sunspot cycle ... averaging about 0.15%.
This NASA-documented short-term variation of the entire
Sun, is now directly traceable (in the HD Model) to the changing
geometric phase relationships between the solar system's two largest
known planets, Jupiter and Saturn (as Nelson long ago confirmed); their
orbital conjunctions -- when both worlds return again to the same
geometric position, relative to one another -- take place on average
roughly every 20 years ... the mean of the full "magnetic" solar cycle!
(At the "half cycle" -- the familiar 11-year sunspot period itself --
Jupiter and Saturn are, of course, 180 degrees out of phase ...
a critical clue to the determinate, modulating hyperspatial geometry
actually inherent in this process ...)
But, if the known changes in solar output are
due to hyperdimensional effects of the largest known planets, what of
the magnitude of "aether stress" produced by our proposed "new planets"
-- with angular momentum contributions hundreds of times greater?;
the long-term cyclic increase in solar energy created by those cyclic
phasings (yet-to-be-experienced in recorded history ...) could measure
as much as several percent above current solar output. This is
more than enough additional energy -- even without Mankind's current
addition of significant "greenhouse gasses" to the atmosphere -- to
trigger profound, millennia-long climatic changes here on Earth--
Including ... melting ice caps; rising ocean levels;
dramatic changes in jet stream altitudes and activity; increased tornado
intensities; increased hurricane wind velocities ... and--
A permanent "El
Nino" (whose warmest waters, satellites report, are at ... ~19.5
degrees).
And that's saying nothing about HD energy added to the
internal workings of our planet ...
From all indications, we are now well into just such
a new, long-term, cyclic solar period ... just as the HD Model has
predicted. The implications should be obvious.
Enter once more, Susan Terebey.
With the discovery and official NASA announcement of Dr. Terebey's
"new planet" -- a "Jovian-type" world 450 light years away ... yet,
in apparent total isolation -- we have the perfect conditions
for a new series of crucial tests of the "Hyperdimensional Model,"
starting with--
1) Systematic spectroscopic observations (carried out
over days or months), to detect the presence of any satellites
of this proposed Jovian-type world. Curiously, this possibility has
not even been alluded to in any of the official NASA presentations
on this object (see NASA
artist's depiction).
It is almost inconceivable that such a giant world could
have formed without multiple orbiting satellites; just look at
the "miniature solar systems" of moons orbiting the major planets of
this solar system ...
Confirmation of such additional objects would in itself
be another major scientific "first." But, in this case, it would also
have far deeper implications; some of those same moons could have considerable
mass themselves -- perhaps as much as Mars ... or even Earth
... depending on the parent planet's mass. The latter could, in fact,
be independently determined (via appropriate application of "Kepler's
Laws") through physical detection of such moons and determining their
orbital periods. This would then provide a completely independent
calibration of the accuracy of the "primary object's" currently estimated
mass -- derived, as Terebey's freely admits, solely from theoretical
"cooling curves" (see above) and the "new planet's" measured IR luminosity
itself.
These additional remarkable objects (if they exist ...)
should be detectable with a variety of present astronomical technologies
-- including Hubble -- provided someone looks.
[And, confirmation of truly massive satellites (a "Mars" or "Earth")
circling this new "potential planet" could vindicate, in a stroke,
a major piece of Van Flandern's own revolutionary model -- that our
own Mars (if not a number of other objects) once orbited a larger
planet in this solar
system as satellites ... until all (including Mars) were released
by the catastrophic explosion of that "parent world."
Van Flandern, one of the world's leading celestial
mechanics experts, has calculated the probable orbital parameters
of such an extraordinary event -- and has reached the conclusion that
Mars' uniquely elliptical path around the Sun (of all the inner planets)
is highly consistent with its "escape" from such a "missing," former
member of the solar system ...]
Successful detection of a "Mars" or "Earth" (or any significant
satellites) orbiting Susan Terebey's "new planet" would immediate present
possibilities for carrying out the same variety of HD tests proposed
(above) for the outer planets of this solar system, starting with--
2) Detection of distinct variations in the "new
planet's" own infrared emissions -- synchronized with the calculated
orbital periods of any detected satellites (or resonances thereof
...). This would offer immediate, compelling evidence for the general
correctness of the "Hyperdimensional Model" ... especially,
if such IR signatures could be matched with similar types of time-varying
emissions observed radiating from the giant planets of this
solar system ...
Such confirmations would provide crucial and timely evidence
supporting the basic correctness of the "HD Model." Equally important,
if such confirmations are forthcoming, the extraordinary possibility
will be further enhanced that this same fundamental physics, in our
own solar system, could ... and has--
Destroyed entire worlds ...
For those who need a "practical" reason to address these issues, consider
this:
Understanding the conditions under which these types
of "epochal events" could come to pass ... and if, through proper
understanding and control of "HD Physics," they can be averted for our
planet ... would seem a simple, basic rationale for renewed interest
in what Maxwell really stated. Given the demonstrable, historically-unprecedented
changes currently occurring in our own environment -- from mysteriously-rising
geophysical and volcanic activity (some of the most significant now
occurring at that suspicious "19.5 degrees!"), to increasingly anomalous
climatological and meteorological activity (does anyone notice that
hurricanes have always been born at an average latitude of ...19.5 degrees?)
-- verifying the effects of a changing "hyperdimensional physics"
in our own neighborhood is far from being "merely academic."
Then, of course, there are the continuing, dramatic changes in the
Sun...
Immediate solar predictions of the HD Model are simple and quite clear:
increasingly violent
average solar surface activity -- modulated with the rising and
falling with the familiar "sunspot cycle" of ~11 years (cycle #23 should
be a "lulu!") -- taking place against a backdrop of equally dramatic,
long-term rising of total solar energy emission.
The major unknown is the overall effect of this slowly
increasing "HD energy" availability throughout the entire solar system;
for, remember, the changing "aether stress" is not localized
inside stars or planets; these concentrations of "matter" merely allow
us to trace the visible effects -- like red dye in clear water -- of
these underlying, changing "hyperspatial strains." Thus, the overall
dynamical effect of the Earth's own significant (to us!) angular
momentum interaction with this changing solar system physics -- including
its own long-term, "higher order rotation," the ~26,000 year precessional
cycle and the mysterious role of the Moon -- is all still quite
uncertain ...
However, recent anomalous observations of perhaps the
most fundamental dynamical parameter of Earth -- its own rotation
-- seem to support this growing perception that "something" indeed is
rapidly changing in the solar system ...
For some inexplicable reason, there has been an accelerating
slow-down of the Earth's spin on its own axis over the last twenty
years -- as measured against electronic transitions of the "Cesium Atomic
Clock," maintained at the National Bureau of Standards, in Boulder,
Colorado.
Theoretically stable to "plus or minus one second in
a million years ..." the official atomic clocks have literally had
to be adjusted by over 20 seconds in these preceding two decades
-- a stunning change by astronomical standards, and striking confirmation
of some kind of major, "progressive phase-shift" now occurring, between
the rotation of our planet and the atomic-level "constants" that govern
the quantum standards of the Clock. This need to, with increasing frequency
(now, approximately every six months) update a full second
differential between "dynamical time" and "time at the atomic level,"
is profound confirmation of some kind of fundamental coupling between
the angular momentum of our own planet, and the larger changes
occurring in the hyperspatial physics of the solar system ... as outlined
in the basic HD Model. This includes the possibility that these changing
"hyperspatial stresses," due to the progressive orbital movement of
our as-yet-undiscovered "outer planets" (in the Model) are simply causing
increasing "Maxwellian scalar potential changes" all across the solar
system at the atomic level -- changing (via the "Aharonov-Bohm
Effect") all resultant quantum-level "constants" governing the
clocks by small (but laboratory-measurable) amounts.
If this is true, it could thus be the Clocks themselves
that are also internally changing ... simultaneous with
the predicted, accelerating slow-down in the basic rotation of the
Earth!
Additional evidence that "something major" is occurring
in the solar system, is the recent announcement (by three major "world-class"
laboratories) of startling changes in another fundamental physical
parameter -- the
Gravitational Constant; according to an article published in
"Science News" in 1995, not only has this centuries-old "constant" been
found to differ now from all previous "textbook" values ... each of
the three laboratories reported different changes ... the largest
amounting to a whopping (by measurement standards) 0.06%!
Completely inexplicable by any mainstream theories, such
changes are intrinsically expected (ala Whittaker's
derivation of "electrogravitic" linkages between gravity and light)
in the true Maxwellian analysis of "varying scalar potentials" of the
vacuum. Again: changes modulated by the changing phase relationships
between our proposed "undiscovered outer planets" in the "total
solar system angular momentum equation."
There is insufficient room to develop here (let
alone to document) all the additional implications stemming
from this Model (that will be done elsewhere). Suffice it to say, this
is intrinsically a changing physics, affecting every known system
of astronomical, physical, chemical and biological interaction differently
over time -- because it affects the underlying, dynamical hyperspace
foundation of "physical reality" itself ... starting with this solar
system; that is implicit in the Model.
And now, according to all accumulating evidence and this
centuries-old physics ... we are simply entering once again (after "only"
13,000 years ...) a phase of this recurring, grand solar system cycle
"of renewed hyperdimensional restructuring of that reality ..."
It is for these basic reasons that NASA must now openly
-- and rapidly -- carry out these recommended new observations of the
solar system, including additional, detailed measurements of "TMR-1C"
... and then immediately tell us the results.
Time is getting short.
