Denver Airport "Y2K" Test - 
Another Signal to the "In Crowd?"

CONTACT INFORMATION:

MICHAEL BARA  lunaranomalies@uswest.net(Note - I am not able to respond to all e-mails, but I will read them -- MB)
RICHARD C. HOAGLAND  - FAX (505) 771-0820

© 1999 THE ENTERPRISE MISSION

In the last several years, we have been carefully watching a series of disturbingdevelopments, both symbolic and tangible, that have led us to believe that something"big" is brewing at NASA. As we outlined in "Oh My God, They Killed SOHO,"we suspect that the space agency is becoming convinced, if they are not already convinced,that we may soon face a serious crisis emanating from outside our own planet. In OMGTKS,we carefully laid out the case for the dangers presented by the Taurid Meteor Stream andNASA's curious lack of interest in responding to it. What we did not discuss, inthat story or the subsequent updates, was just what our suspicions were regarding theplans that NASA did have in place to deal with such a future catastrophic event.

For some time now it has been our quietly held position that NASA's chief aim was tofind a way "off planet" in the event of cometary impact or even a "12thplanet" pole shifting scenario. Obviously, the rank and file billions of us could notbe saved from the consequences of such an event. Assuming that NASA was restricted tocurrently acknowledged technology (read: not "Hyperships") it would likely bepossible only to save a few hundred, if that, of the "elite." These individualswould be selected from the creme de la creme of  our society, the mostgenetically desireable and materially accomplished of our civilization. This "escape plan" would probably involvethe use of the upcoming Lockheed "Venture Star"spacecraft (the new single stage-to-orbit space shuttle replacement based on the nearlyready "X-33" development craft currently being assembled at the ultra secretPalmdale and "Skunk Works facilities) as a sort of Noah's Ark for the 20th centuryand the new IS(I)S station.

An artist's concept of the Venturestar entitled "Heading out." Headingout to where?

It matters not whether we face any real threat. What matters is that NASA/JPL, managedby the Pentagon and possibly other unseen handlers, certainly believe it. They have beentasked with finding out if the threat is real, and if it is, to find a way out. Imagineour surprise when we found an entry in a popular web site, "Zeta-Talk," which outlined exactly these sameideas we had been privately contemplating. This site purports to be the perspective of the"Zeta's," the tiny little big headed bug-eyed aliens commonly known as the"Grays." As with all such sites, we take the data presented there with a grainof salt, assuming it to be "disinformation" -- a few truths intermixed with manylies in order to give credibility to the lies. The crux of the information deals with acoming "pole-shift" (actually a crustal shift) caused by the close approach ofZechariah Sitchin's legendary "12th planet." We do not necessarily reject thisperspective out of hand, but a very strong case can be made for a variety of doomsdayscenarios.

The biggest dilemma for this model was the big question -- escape to where?

Ever since the new Mars Global Surveyor images of Cydonia were released, we have beenattempting to understand the political motivation behind this very sudden decision. Why --after nearly 20 years of secrecy and obfuscation -- did NASA, through its "appendantbody" at JPL, decide to raise the veil, even if ever so slightly? Why did they decideto respond to a public and a research community they had so steadfastly resisted andridiculed for nearly two decades?

Despite the continuing efforts of Dr. Michael Malin and his fellow black artspractitioners at Malin Space Science Systems (MSSS)to cloud the issue by releasing deliberately degraded and even flatly altered images ofthe Martian landscape, anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of geologic processes knewimmediately upon viewing the new images that the Face and "City" objects thatwere imaged are indisputably artificial. Certainly Malin and the JPL coven knew that theycould not fool anyone with such knowledge by releasing these conveniently aimed andexcessively noisy images on the Internet. So why bother? It is our suspicion, becomingincreasingly confirmed by recent events, that "we" -- the public, media andresearchers -- were never the "target audience" in the first place.

We surmise that NASA is attempting to demonstrate to the monied elite of our world thatsuch a trip is plausible in an attempt to obtain private funding. Our suspicions werereinforced by the recent ballyhoo over John Glenn's return to space.

Given that 55% of the wealth in this country is held by persons 65 years of age andolder, Glenn's purely symbolic mission became a demonstration to this geriatric (andsoon-to-be geriatric) wealthy populace that they could survive a lengthy mission to theRed Planet. Even assuming the disruption of a crustal shift, such a journey might onlyhave to provide for it's members for a decade or so on the Martian surface. Winds,volcanic activity and below freezing temperatures should have all stabilized by then,allowing the same (now much older) group to return to the more hospitable Earth. More andmore, NASA's carefully timed press releases seem aimed to promote Mars as a potential homefor humanity in the future. And the press, in line with other media, are lapping up theidea.

May 1991 Cover of Life Magazine

In this model, the new Cydonia images were provided in order to show this"in crowd" that suitable habitats already exist on Mars. Showing the imageswhile at the same time trashing them is a more than effective way to get them out withoutalarming the general public with anything so dramatic as an admission of theirartificiality. At the same time, those already in the know would have access to the"real" stuff -- the full-res high quality images that were not released to thepublic.

This model is supported by new Enterprise Mission enhancements done on theoriginal MGS frames using advanced tools and techniques like "MaxIm DL" (Maximum entropyDeconvolution). What MaxIm DL enables us to do is to remove more of the excessive noisethat was introduced to the orginal images when they were contrast compressed and strippedof 50% of the expected data by Malin before release. Using this and other tools, astrange, honey comb like "mesh" appears on the Face images, nearly identical tothe same mesh seen in the "Room sized"cells on the "Main Pyramid" in the "City."

Our critics, of course (including some of the self proclaimed"serious" Cydonia researchers), will argue as they have in the past that thesefeatures are "enhancement artifacts." Besides the obvious fact that the"artifacts" are not in alignment with the scan pattern of the images,what they have continually failed to take into account is the second fairly obvious meansof testing such an argument. Take the image below from "Leavitown" southof the City at Cydonia. These critics have claimed that the cellular structure evident onthe 10-story high hexagonal building are just such artifacts. What they have failed tonotice however, is the shadow pattern on the face of the object itself. With the suncoming from the upper left hand corner of the image, note how the side nearest the sun isbrighter and somewhat washed out. These cells -- which the critics claim are not reallythere -- have darker areas inside while the raised "ribs" around these darkpatches are brighter. This is exactly how they should look if the ribs and cells arereally there. In addition, the farther away from the direct sun the cells are, the darkerthey get and the more clearly dileniated the ribs are. Again, this is entirelyconsistent with actual artificial features on the surface of Mars itself, and entirelyinconsistent with random imaging artifacts. Come on guys, how can the artifacts"know" which way to make the shadows fall? The obvious "Occam's Razor"conclusion is that they can't.

Obviously there is a lot more data in the original images than the onesreleased to the unwashed masses. What this all amounts to is that there seem to be quite afew existing and fairly intact structures already at Cydonia, and the much better versionsof these images that the "In-crowd" would have access to would reveal them quitenicely.

So Mars might seem like a pretty reasonable place to go considering whatmight happen here. But if our model was correct, there would have to be a bit moreplanning in place than this. Since Earth is ultimately a better place for our species tolive, what plans are in place to account for the devastating effects of this globalcatastrophe? Certainly these "Kings" are not planning on returning here only tospend their remaining days in harsh toil trying to rebuild this broken world?

Of course not. So where do they land? Giza might seem like a good place,given that the Pyramids may have already survived just such a previous disaster. But therejust isn't much to build on there. Phoenix, which we are certain is planned to rise as thenew capitol, is an equally unpleasant place with little to recommend it. It is highlyunlikely that a stash of machinery and supplies would survive the 500 mph winds in theopen desert, even if you buried it. Figuring out just how deep to go to make sure yourbadly needed cache is safe would be next to impossible. No, if this plan was to work you'dneed a better location at higher altitude to protect it from the sloshing seas. You'd wantmountains all around to protect against the harsh winds, and you want it to have beenseismically stable for some significant amount of time in the past. And you'd have to havestarted to prepare for this before now.

You'd want Denver.

The Denver airport is, not coincidentally in our opinion, just aboutperfect for such a use. It's runways are built down into the ground, almost surrounded byrevetments, to protect from high winds. There was a "mistaken" 10,000 footrunway built (perfect for a craft like the VentureStar) and then buried under four inchesof dirt when the planners, the "New World Airport Commission," suddenly decidedit was in the wrong place.

You also want miles of underground tunnels and facilities, maybe evenconnecting with your command center inside Cheyenne mountain, to store all the stuffyou'll need when you get back. No problem, DIA has it.

And of course, since you are obsessed with ritual and symbolism, you haveto put some hints somewhere around the place that indicated what was planned for those ofus that were left behind.

As bizarre as these decorations are (and we have a full analysis comingsoon) they are really the just the tip of the symbolic iceberg. What you really need toget the dollars flowing is to convince your audience that DIA will still be around whenyou get back. One way to do this is to demonstrate that you have planned ahead well bytesting the facility against the biggest looming threat on the horizon.

Y2K.

When we learned that the air traffic control system was going to be Y2Ktested at none other than the Denver airport, the newest and therefore least likely toairport to have a problem with the "Millennium bug," our ears pricked up. Such atest would serve to reassure that pesky public that all things would stay the same comeJanuary 1, 2000. And it would demonstrate to the in-crowd that the planning necessary toassure there'd be a place to return to had been carried out effectively. But how to checkthis idea?

As with all things connected to this on going conspiracy, it of coursewould have to have some spiritual element, some connection to the gods of ancient Egypt,Isis and Osiris, who are so critical to everything NASA has done over the last 40 years.So when the test was implemented at midnight on the 11th of April of this year, we wereready with our trusty copies of Red Shift 2.

We found the middle belt star, Alnilam, at 19° 47´ below the horizon.While this is well within our margin of error for such alignments, the fact that it was at47 arc minutes struck us as particularly significant. Remember, our ubiquitous 19.5°"tetrahedral" altitude is a rounded figure. The more precise touch point is 19.47degrees. So while they didn't hit it right on (which would actually be 19degrees, 28 arc minutes) they took the next best "symbolic" alignment.Since Red Shift does not measure time any closer than minute by minute, we do not knowwhen precisely Alnilam hit 19° 28´. But it was certainly within about 90 seconds of deadup midnight.

But if this was really all about Mars, then there must surely have beensome significant alignments there, too. After all, we have always argued that thesecelestial alignments must be in some symbolic context, or they don't really count. Forinstance, an alignment of Mars over the launch pad of a mission to the Moon is notnecessarily a primary "hit." (Yes we do classify these "coincidences asprimary, secondary or tertiary in our system). Since the Viking 1 and 2 landing sites arethe first "temples" established by JPL on the Red Planet, it would make sense tolook there first. Certainly Cydonia could not be excluded if our suspicions about it beingthe Martian landing site were correct.

And guess what?

As you can see, there was a stunning connection between Mars and Denver atthe precise moment of this crucial test of the air traffic control system. It is doubtfulthat any other moment for decades either in the past or future provided the crafters ofthis plan such a unique opportunity.

The only question left now is what to do about it. We believe that thesecrecy and manipulation on the part of NASA around these and other such plans stems froma couple of mistaken beliefs. First, we suspect that the insiders are convinced that theyhave time, maybe even until 2012 when the Mayan calendar runs out, to make their getaway.For a variety of reasons we shall make clear in the coming weeks, we think that if aglobal catastrophe is in the making it will be on a much shorter time frame than that, asearly as 2003 (excluding any "designer comets" ala OMGTKS).The other core problem is that "they" seem to be convinced that nothing can stopthe coming disruption. We believe that this assumption too is in error, despite whatNASA/JPL may have deciphered either from Earth based discoveries (like the recentlyuncovered "Tomb of Osiris") or from input by "outside agencies." Inthe coming weeks we will make clear just why they are wrong, and what can be done aboutit.

Stay tuned ...