|
Continued from Part I
On another portion of this image, M04-03228,
is an object that we flatly cannot explain in any of our preconceived
concepts of Martian architecture. In fact, it so far beyond the simple
tetrahedral pyramids and sculpted Face
of Cydonia, that we cannot even be sure it is technological at all --
at least in the sense we currently understand "technology."

We could not help but notice that this "teardrop,"
bore a strong resemblance at first glance to a fossilized creature, like
some bizarre enormous trilobite.
Now, we have advocated for quite awhile that the civilization at Cydonia
was most likely human or humanoid in derivation, based on the human-like
visage of the Face and the similarity of the Martian
Monuments to terrestrial architecture. This guy, what ever he is,
seemed to fly in the Face of that assumption. So we were immediately reluctant
to even consider the fossil possibility. But, the closer we looked, the
weirder it got.
The most noticeable characteristics of this
"bug" are what appears to be "shell" on the right
hand side of the "head." This shell has a wavy, eroded look
to it, but one that is admittedly closer to what we would expect of a
biological decay of a protective shell rather than a geologic or even
architectural feature. Below that shell, clearly underneath what would
have once covered the entire object, are some more tubes. But in this
context, they take on the look more of a central nervous system or rib
structure than a plumbing network.
Below that are some sort of tubular structures
which once emerged from the base of the "shell," almost like
"feelers."

In close-up, the base of the "ribs"
show evidence of more geometric structure, what we'd expect to see if
this was a constructed object rather than a "fossil." And below
that, separated from the "bug," is more evidence of this geometric
arrangement.

So what is this thing? We just don't know.
It has aspects of technology as well as biology, and defies our attempts
to categorize it. Perhaps we are being too black and white in our thinking.
Perhaps it is a combination of both, an "organic technology"
created by some unimaginable prior inhabitants of the planet. What ever
it is, we are certain of only two things about it:
It isn't geology, in any sense of the word.
And it deserves to be re-imaged and further investigated.
And the sooner the better.
What you say, Mike? Wanna take (another) ride?
|