The "Age of Horus" Dawns
The Time is Now ...

... Because it's Later Than You Think

Part V



P.O. BOX52017
FAX (505)332-1164


To make the proverbial long story short, the Elizabethan Rosicrucian's were ultimately successful in their venture to establish a presence in the New Atlantis. As we saw in Part IV, the motivations for the English coming to "La Merica" - the "land of the bright star" - and attempting to colonize it were based not on any of the conventionally accepted reasons, but instead on an esoteric obsession with "calendars and sacred lands." This reasoning continued to be withheld from the colonists for nearly two centuries before an elite group of colonials -- all Scottish Rite Freemasons -- started a revolt and claimed the land (including "God's longitude") for themselves. As is well known, the leaders of the American revolution were members of a few Scottish Rite lodges in the New World. In the time between the Roanoke expeditions and the revolution itself, the roots of Dee's Rosicrucian movement had found their way deep into the halls of the learned and privileged. Washington, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson -- among other revolutionary figures -- were not just touched by it but deeply entwined in it.

They, as Dee, Ralegh and Bacon before them, viewed the New World as a rising Atlantis, a special place were the Freemasonic/Rosicrucian concepts of egalitarianism and self determination were to be nurtured for the good of all mankind. They established a minimalist government and set about the business of making America the most powerful nation on Earth. Thanks to the quiet intervention of this secretive establishment at key moments in our history, the United States of America eventually attained the status of the "shining city on the hill" that its Masonic progenitors had aimed for.

And at the core of what we now see as the crowning achievement in human history -- the existence of the United States itself -- is a 33-year calendar cycle. A cycle believed by even those who discovered its secretive influence to be based not on any Christian precepts, but on a very accurate method of measuring the tropical year.

Yet, it goes even farther than that. While it is true that the 33-year cycle could be seen as being based in the traditional life of Jesus, and therefore could be used as the primary motivator behind these clandestine machinations, clearly even Cassidy and Steele acknowledge that the mathematics, rather than the symbolism, is crucial to their claim. Why then do they persist in maintaining that their admitted "conspiracy" go no further? As they have made clear, they refuse to consider anything other than the most prosaic political motivations for the behavior of Dee, Ralegh, Elizabeth, James, and Bacon. Is it really possible that this grandest of grand plans, the very formation of a nation based on the ideals of the old Atlantis on the same ground as that lost civilization, be so mundane?

No, it isn't. And as we have shown, you need look no further than the writings of Dee and Bacon to see that.

The key to decoding this mystery lies in the mathematics, in the 33-year cycle that is so replete with ancient Masonic symbolism. Why, after all, is the number "33" so important in Masonic lore? What magical properties does a mere number have that it should represent the highest level of enlightenment in the most ancient of secret societies?

Because it's Hyperdimensional.

Clearly if this 33-year calendar cycle has mathematical roots that predate the death of Christ, then it stands to reason that the number itself must have some significance beyond that symbolic event. And so it does ...

"Call on me in prayer and I will answer you. I will show you great and mysterious things which you still do not know."

--Jeremiah 33:3

Even the authors of the Old Testament understood that the number itself was the key to many things. That it somehow held tremendous power. Some Biblical scholars have referred to Jeremiah 33:3 as "god's phone number," the moment of darkness for Jeremiah where God shows him how he can be reached, and how the powers he posses can be accessed. Certainly, the Hyperdimensional aspects of "33:3" could unlock these "great and mysterious things" that the Lord is alluding to.

And the authors were right. The number 33 is significant in the underlying mathematics of Cydonia, and therefore Hyperdimensional Physics. As we have noted before, engineer and probabilities expert Mary Anne Weaver has pointed out that one of the basic trigonometric functions of a circumscribed tetrahedron, the sine of 19.471 -- the key "circumscribed tetrahedral angle" at Cydonia -- is .3333. That in of itself would be merely "interesting" if it were the only mathematical link between 19.5 and 33, but there is another, more significant link. 

A tetrahedron is one of the so-called "Platonic solids," so named because the Greek mathematician Plato was one of the first to popularize them (although, like some modern "science popularizers," he actually "borrowed" them from the earlier insights of another genius Greek geometer, Pythagoras). Each of these Platonic solids (there are only five) is characterized by the fact that they are all "regular" polyhedra, polyhedrons that have regular polygonal faces, or faces with a straight-sided figure with equal sides and equal angles. In other words, they will all fit neatly in a sphere -- with no edges or angles protruding through the surface. Of these, the simplest, and therefore the "first" among them, is our old friend the "tetrahedron."

Each of these Platonic solids is commonly identified among mathematicians with the notation {p, q}, where p is the number of sides in each face and q is the number faces that meet at each vertex. The tetrahedron has 3 sides on each face and has 3 faces that meet at each vertex. As a result, its nodal designation in this system would be {3,3}.

Or, obviously, "33."

By simply taking out the comma, we can see that every bit as much as the ubiquitous "19.5," the number "33" says; "look to your tetrahedrons!" It's just a little less obvious, a little harder to figure out, a little more coded.

So it makes complete sense then that a secret society, with an ancient knowledge of Hyperdimensional Physics at the core of its high mysteries, would choose the 33rd level as its symbolic highest level of enlightenment. Most observers would never figure it out. At least not before we got a good look at Cydonia.

If you need any more evidence that our Masonic founding fathers understood the significance of not only Cassidy and Steele's "God's Longitude" but also our own Hyperdimensional Physics, you need look no further than our own Nation's capitol for it.

The architect of Washington DC, Pierre Charles L'Enfante, was a French Freemason who was well acquainted with Benjamin Franklin from the latter's time in France. L'Enfante cleverly encoded not only the Masonic symbol of the Compass and Square into his design for our capitol city, but also apparently an inverted pentagram, commonly considered an occult/Satanic symbol. The association of the pentagram with Satan is a fairly recent development, however, and the geometric symbol would have had a completely different meaning to a Scottish Rite Freemason like L'Enfante.

In Freemasonry, the Pentagram is found commonly in the inner chambers the lodges. Its ancient origins are as a symbol for the star Sirius, inextricably linked through the Masonic lore to the Egyptian goddess Isis. As such, it has become the symbol for the Order of the Eastern Star, the female counterpart to the exclusively male brotherhood of Freemasonry. 

But all of this Egyptian/Masonic symbolism is ultimately linked to the capitol city in another crucial way. It is fairly clear at this point that the sacred "33-year" cycle calendrical longitude was picked as the site for our nations capitol for a reason. It should also be evident that the Masonic order had full knowledge of this longitude's mathematical significance when they chose to place "Washington District of Columb(i)a" dead on it. But what evidence do we have (beyond the fact that the cycle itself is "coincidentally" 33 years) that any of this was based on some secret knowledge of a physics that has its modern roots in the ruins of Cydonia?

It's all in the latitude.

Certainly, architects of a grand and covert plan such as this one would have carefully considered the site of their most crucial shrine -- the very capitol of the "New Atlantis," -- based on more than just the longitude. Wouldn't the latitude of this all important linch-pin site reveal something about the selectors as well?

Indeed it does. If there were in fact some Hyperdimensional connection to the placement of our Nations Capitol, we would expect to see it revealed in a significant way. And we do.

Let's consider this for a moment. The most obvious way to encode such a message would be to place the city on an obvious "tetrahedral" latitude. But 19.5 N by 77 W would have placed the capitol city off the land and into the ocean off of Mexico. Further, this was territory that the English/Masonic colonists did not control. Similarly, placing it at a latitude of 33 N would have left them trying to build their city in the Atlantic off the coast of Georgia. So the only logical place they could choose for their new Atlantean capitol was where they eventually did place it -- 39 N.

Huh? Just how is 39, not 19.5 or 33, tetrahedral or Hyperdimensional? Well, if you simply divide 39 by 2 you get  -- 19.5. So, since it was impractical for them to place their city where they clearly wanted to -- at one of these Hyperdimensional latitudes -- they settled for the next best thing. A "multiplicative harmonic" of 19.5 -- 39! 

There is a precedent in our investigation for this kind of encoding. At the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, there are two launch pads from which all of the Apollo and Space Shuttle missions have been launched. They are certainly the best known launch sites in the world to any space exploration buff. Pads 39a and 39b.

Now, it has always bugged us, why 39a and b, instead of 39 and 40, or 38 and 39? The answer is that neither of those combinations is tetrahedral! As if to reinforce the point, the two pads are adjacent to a runway -- the only runway at the cape -- 

-- Runway 33.

And lest you forget, the sine of 19.471 (the un-rounded 19.5) is -- .3333.

And the Cape itself, "Cape Canaveral" translates to English as the "Cape of Reeds." And what ancient Egyptian god was associated with reeds?

Osiris, of course. They may have just as well called it the Cape of Osiris.

Starting to note a trend here?

Now, our critics will say that all of this is just a lucky coincidence, that we are applying "magical thinking" to pull connections out of our rear ends. But how likely is that really? Is it really so hard to believe that the sighting of Washington DC is based not on some random choice of good swampland but instead on the ancient and esoteric teachings to which all of these Founders were demonstrably students? That this same sort of mathematical/religious symbolism has simply continued another 225 years beyond the Founding of this Nation to the present day, just as it has for the many thousands of years of human history leading up to 1776? Why would 2,000 (plus!) years of devotion to this kind of symbolic thinking simply stop at the doorstep of the 20th century and not find its way into an organization like NASA, demonstrably dominated (how many top NASA officials and astronauts are Masons?!) by modern devotees of these same organizations? Who really is reaching for an explanation here?

Obviously, they are. But there is still one task ahead of us. One final point that has to made to tie all this history together and explain why it is intricately connected to the political events of today.

What's it all about? Why has all this been done? To what Ultimate Purpose has this Nation, called in partial truth by Lincoln -- "... the Last Best Hope of Mankind -- been born?

If we turn our attention back to Egypt, back to the Giza plateau and the monuments placed there, we can start to understand the answer. The precise "median transit" of Sirius across the Meridian, New Year's Eve 2000, is the overwhelming clue. As Hancock and Bauval have pointed out, the Great Pyramid itself can be thought of as giant "Meridian machine," a device used to monitor the movements of the heavens relative the Giza Meridian. And the key to figuring out the importance of the Meridian is in the aforementioned "airshafts" in the Great Pyramid.

As has been documented first by Sir Flinders Petrie and later by many others, including Robert Bauval and Graham Hancock, the pathways run through the structure -- exactly along the North/South meridian -- two each from the so-called "King's chamber" and "Queen's chamber." Extensive studies on these shafts were carried out over the years by such luminaries as  Smyth, Proctor, Antoniadi, Biot, and the most well-known, Sir Norman Lockyer (famous from his "Stonehenge is aligned to the Summer Solstice" measurements) -- who proposed a variety of "astronomical alignments" in the 1800s for the Giza monuments. Several of them noted that in 2500 BC -- the traditionally accepted "Pyramid Age" when the structures were supposedly built -- these "shafts" aligned with stars considered very significant in the Egyptian religious traditions of the time. The first solid "connection" to Orion of the Southern airshaft (from the King's Chamber) was the work done by Alexander Badawy (an Egyptian architect) in conjunction with Virginia Trimble (an American astronomer) -- in 1963. Ultimately, it was agreed that the two southern shafts aligned with Sirius and Al-Nitak in Orion's belt (the Great Pyramid star) respectively, and the two northern shafts aligned with Thuban (Alpha-Draconis), which was the Polar star in that epoch, and Kochab (Beta Ursa Minor). Bauval seems to have been the first to propose a connection of the Queen's chamber "Southern airshaft" specifically to Sirius...

The significance of Orion (Osiris) and Sirius (Isis) has been covered in these pages many times. But why would the Egyptians aim the other shafts at the Pole Star of the day and a seemingly meaningless star like Beta Ursa Minor?

The Pole star is easy enough to figure out. As Hancock, Bauval and many others have noted, the shafts are the key to understanding the Giza complex as a "precessional clock." There is no way better to get an advanced future civilization to appreciate the effects of precession than to focus on the Polar star. It might also be useful if you wanted that future observer to understand just where he was in this precessional cycle of 25,828 years.

So why does that matter?

Well, as Enterprise principal investigator Richard C. Hoagland pointed out (in the " Lost Tombs" Revisited: Parts 5 and 6), the "Osiris myths" of the Egyptians appear to be coded around the cycle of precession. To master astronomers like the ancient Egyptians, an understanding of this fundamental astronomical concept would have opened the doorway (Stargate?) to an even deeper understanding of the higher dimensional nature of the precessional process. And that would have inevitably led them (if they did not already know, thanks to Osiris himself) to appreciate the inherent problem in the physics of precession. We described this previously in the article "Oh My God, They Killed MARCI. "

... there is disturbing evidence that the Earth's "precession" --  it's "wobble" on the central axis of rotation -- is caused not by the gravitational tug of the Moon, but by an unseen and as yet not understood "internal force." This "higher dimensional tug" is acting on the planet from within, trying to move it into proper resonance with the rest of the solar system.

The historical record also implies that this steady "precess" is subject to sudden and catastrophic (for the planet's inhabitants) shifts, causing the Earth itself to literally "flip" in an attempt to realign with this unseen force.

This cyclic upheaval in the planet's axial rotation may have been caused by the destruction of a planet in the "Bode orbit" between Mars and Jupiter. Since in the Hyperdimensional model the planets are all connected, the destruction of this planet would have sent the entire solar system into "dissonance." The periodic pole shifts are an attempt to create a more resonant alignment with the other bodies in the system.

While this may seem far-fetched, consider the case of our 7th planet, Uranus. Uranus has been violently pulled off it's more proper "normal" orientation to the plane of the ecliptic to be almost 90 from the solar "North."

This bizarre condition has no conventional explanation ...

Now, assuming that the Egyptians understood this fundamental precept of Hyperdimensional Physics (or, more likely, were carrying out instructions "left by the gods" by rote), then creating a massive "precessional clock" like the Great Pyramid would do them and future generations a great service --

-- by telling them how much time they had left!

You see, in this consistent, highly predicable cycle, there are key "power points" along the precessional arc. When the Earth reaches successive "right angles" in it's circumnavigation of this arc (relative to a predetermined starting point -- probably the enormous angular momentum represented by the Galactic Center, although that is still to be determined) -- at the 0, 90, 180, and 270 points relative to that "mark" -- the system is most likely to experience an "upset." In a cycle of 25,920 years (now reduced from that canonical number to the current 25,828), that means that at intervals of about 6,500 years, you have a "window" in which a planet wide "local" catastrophe might happen -- specifically, a Hyperdimensionally-induced pole shift. To an observer at Giza, this steady rising and falling of the precessional elevator would be marked by rising and falling of stars as they transited the meridian.

Indeed, this seems to be the purpose of the Giza plateau itself!

Hancock and Bauval argued in " TheMessage of the Sphinx " that this "Meridian machine" was used to track the progress of Orion's belt stars as they rose and fell in the endless cycle of precession. They noted that the belt starts were not aligned perfectly with the Pyramids in any time period other than one -- 10,500 BC. This particular epoch also happens to be the period when the belt stars reached the nadir of their movement along the precessional elevator, 9 20' above the horizon. In other words, the current precessional half-cycle began around 12,500 years ago, meaning we are rapidly approaching the zenith of this same half cycle. So by tracking the rise of the belt stars, the Egyptians would know well in advance when the "big one" was going to hit (at the top and bottom of each Orion belt cycle).

But it gets potentially worse. What if the the best the Egyptians could do was to find a "window" in which this event might take place? What if the rise of Orion on its precessional elevator was only a general marker of this window, rather than a drop dead date? And what if it was not Orion that was the key to marking the opening of this inexact window, but Sirius? Perhaps there was a "sign" to watch for in the heavens, like the crossing of Sirius on the Giza meridian at midnight 2000?!

A further clue may be found in tracing the path of Sirius through the night sky for the last 200,000 years or so. As Enterprise principal investigator Richard C. Hoagland tracked this he discovered that the stars "proper motion," its motion relative to the other background stars, carried it to a curious alignment with the belt stars of Orion exactly 13,237 years ago. This coincides very well with the timing of our supposed last "big hit" in the precessional Cycle.  If the vertical motion of Orion's belt was used as marker by the ancient Egyptians to determine the top and bottom of a precessional cycle, it does not necessarily follow that our catastrophic pole shifts happened during these periods. What it could mean is that Orion became a significant marker of precession precisely because that last pole shift happened when it was at the bottom of it's last precessional half cycle around 10,500 BC. If this is the case, then the peak of this cycle is reached in 2414, or 12,914 years after Orion reached the nadir of it's precession. 

But what if the last precession induced pole shift did not take place, exactly 12,914 years ago, but instead 13,327 years ago? Perhaps the significance of Sirius is not just that it is the brightest star in the sky, or its unique motion, but rather that it is a further marker of when the golden age that the Egyptians described as "The First Time" ended in a planet wide global cataclysm? Perhaps a time when Isis (Sirius) was in lock step with the belt stars of her brother and husband Osiris (Orion) 13,327 years ago. 

If that is the case, then we've got even less time than we earlier assumed. Our "drop dead" date of 2414 for the peak of the next precessional cycle is severely reduced, to a far more contemporary 2087!


This whole system is further complicated by the more local influence of at least one massive previously unseen member(s) of the solar system. The Hyperdimensional model is built on the core idea that it is the angular momentum of the planets that is the cause of not only the sun's energetic output, but the anomalous energy output of the outer planets as well. As Enterprise principal investigator Richard Hoagland first laid out in the Hyperdimensional Physics paper, there must be (in the Hyperdimensional model) one massive or two relatively average sized bodies far beyond the orbit of Pluto for the system to work. Without them, there is missing angular momentum in the system.

So there was an inherent prediction in the model, backed by a specific prediction in the paper, that we would find these other missing planets in far distant orbits. Since that paper was put forth in July 1998, there has been a confirmation of exactly such a discovery. Unfortunately, this is hardly good news. It is bad enough that we may be approaching one of the key angular relationships on the precessional circle, but if the Earth were to find itself in alignment with the spin axis of one of these larger, unseen bodies, say at an angle of 90 or 180, then that also could be the trigger for the Earth  to try and realign itself with this larger system. 

Certainly, evidence exists that we may be close to just such a circumstance.

This latest admission of the probable existence of a tenth planet is not the first such story to hit the news. Indeed, it seems that NASA may have been looking for the source of this "missing momentum" for years. In 1983, an announcement was made to the effect that the IRAS Infrared satellite had discovered a massive and at that time inexplicable object very far out in the solar system. JPL scientist Gerry Neugebauer and Cornell professor Dr. James Houck were interviewed by the Washington Post (click here to see the article page 1 and page 2) and were quite unambiguous in their assessment of the object. Saying that it was possibly a small star but more probably was a large planet sized object, they were loath to classify it, claiming that it was probably and entirely new class of planet or quasi-stellar object. They both emphasized that the object was a true mystery and promised to dig into its true nature. Curiously, when I inquired with Dr. Neugebauer about the story recently and asked if there had been any papers published on it, he claimed that he had been quoted "out of context" and that he did not remember the object in question. 


I think the quote was taken out of context. I do not know about it nor
any follow-up.
G Neugebauer"

Now, how likely is it that when someone is quoted in a front page story in the Washington Post, that he would not remember the subject of the story?! The answer of course, is not likely at all. It is even less likely that two such eminent scientists would give an interview on such an object if there was "nothing to it." 

And the reporter, Thomas O'Toole, was hardly the type of man to quote someone "out of context." A veteran of more than twenty years of science reporting for the Post, O'Toole was a well known and widely respected journalist in the science community, and scientists were even known to seek him out to make public their research findings because of his untarnished reputation as a smart, fair, honest and above all cautious science reporter. To suggest that he would distort or sensationalize the story is inconsistent with his reputation.

Then there is the further problem with the story itself. The quotes are extensive and make no bones about what it is that is being discussed, so it's hard to imagine what Neugebauer might consider to have been "out of context." (Of course, another JPL scientist claimed we quoted him "out of context" when we posted his e-mail flatly denying that the Hubble telescope could image the Moon in a story which showed the first such image).

All of this though, is predicated on two assumptions. One, that the ancient Egyptians understood "Hyperdimensional Physics," and two, that we are very near another 180 "overturn." What evidence do we have for either of these?

On this precession circle, the worst case scenarios are at the 0 (26,000) and 180 (13,000) marks. Making the 90 (6,500) and 270 (19,500) points along the path potentials for "littler" catastrophes. Logically, we should now be able to look back at the existing geological record and make some sort of assessment, to see if these "theoretical powerpoints" show a record of  "global environmental catastrophes" at the appropriate predicted intervals.

 If we work back 26,000 years from the present, we reach the year of 24,000 BCE. A recent book by Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas, "Uriel's Machine" documents the discovery of a 26,000 year old clay figurine "factory" near Dolce Vestonice in the Czech republic. Apparently used to produce and then deliberately destroy these figurines -- implying a fairly sophisticated economy among other things -- this extensive settlement went silent around 24,000 BCE. Finding human settlements dating this far back is rare indeed, and it will be interesting to see if other ruins are found implying a flourishing civilization around this time that was suddenly halted.

The next big hit on the precessional cycle would have come about 13,000 years after that, and should have left considerably more evidence of a cataclysmic upheaval in about 11,000 BCE. Another book, by D.S. Allan & J.B. Delair, "When the Earth nearly died" extensively documents evidence of a worldwide global catastrophe 11,500 years ago. Although off in their dating by nearly 2 millennia, the time frame is fairly close considering the vagaries of current dating methods (see below). The authors attribute this disaster to a "12th Planet" like object they name "Phaeton." Since they have no real background in Hyperdimensional Physics, it is understandable that they sought a "conventional" causality for the devastation they discovered.

Others, like Hancock and Knight & Lomas, have independently concluded that the catastrophe which ended the last ice age took place very close to the time frame of 11,000 BCE. While the evidence is not likely to ever be good enough to conclusively date this upheaval, it seems to fall within the ballpark to be our candidate "precessional event."

The most recent "little" event should have then taken place around 4,500 BCE, and it is at this time that we see the emergence of the two grandest civilizations of the ancient world -- out of essentially nothingness -- Sumer/Babylonia and Egypt. Indeed, these two civilizations sprang from the darkness of the past fully evolved, with high knowledge in astronomy, agriculture and architecture that would slowly devolve over the centuries. Many have implied that their knowledge was the remnants of a higher advanced antediluvian civilization. It certainly seems to us that their emergence from the mists of history is quite convenient in its timing.

One of the problems with dating such ancient events is that the most commonly used dating methods, examination of layering of various elements in sedimentation, carbon 14 decay of organic materials, magnetic field reversals due to "planetary hiccups," etc, is that while they are thought be reliable, they are in fact far from it.

Carbon 14 dating is probably the most widely used and supposedly reliable dating method for archeological ruins. The concept is based on the idea that radioactive elements have a "half-life," a supposedly constant rate at which they decay into non-radioactive or "stable" elements. Archeologists use counts of the radioactive isotope C-14 to date organic remains such as wood, bone, and charcoal. It's usable in the range of about 50,000 years to the present. 

Here's why it works: Living animals (and people) absorb all the isotopes of carbon. They absorb the unstable isotope Carbon-14, as well as the stable isotopes C-13 and C-12. Carbon-14 decays into N-14 continuously. After an organism's death, C-14 continues to decay but no new C-14 is added. So measuring the amount of C-14 left (compared to the overall amount of carbon in the sample) tells you how long ago the organism lived and died. 

There is only one problem. Radioactive decay is not constant.

This long held canonical belief was exploded a few years ago on a national TV broadcast of ABC'S "Good Morning America." On June 11th, 1997, ABC broadcast a "live" test of a device created by Dr. James Patterson of Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. The device was based on Patterson's previous design of a heat producing "over-unity" machine. His approach was very similar to the "cold fusion" work of Pons and Fleischman, but his design uses small, perfectly round palladium coated beads in the machine.

The experiment consisted of circulating 7.5 grams of depleted uranium dissolved in water and run through the "Patterson Transmutation Coil." The experiment began at noon (Wednesday, May 28th 1997 in the laboratories of CETI in Sarasota, FL, USA) with the Geiger Counter registering at 3760 CPM. After only a couple of hours, the radioactivity was cut down more than half. The actual final reading achieved was 1000 CPM (a 73.4% Reduction) as measured by the Geiger Counter after a run time of 2 hours and 15 minutes. 

Now according to every known "law" of physics, what happened during this "live" experiment on ABC is flatly impossible! What Patterson's machine did was to take a natural process -- the decay of depleted uranium -- and basically remove the radioactivity in a little over two hours. This process should normally take over 4 billion years!

Even more exciting, this experiment has now been duplicated and patents have been issued for several of Patterson's machines.

What this means is that using radioactive decay as a method for dating anything is highly unreliable, because the core assumption -- that decay is constant and immutable -- is flat wrong!

In fact, there are significant discrepancies between measurements made of natural rates of radioactive decay in the 50's and today. The first measurements, taken by the "father" of radiocarbon dating (Libby), listed the half life of Carbon 14 as 5,568 years. By 1962, only 11 years later, the half-life was "recalibrated" to be 5,730 years. By the mid eighties, some charts were giving a figure of 6,380 years, a difference of 1.14 percent in only 36 years! The working assumption has always been that these earlier readings were "wrong" because we all "know" that the rate of decay is constant. Since this is now proven (via the Patterson demonstration) to be a fallacious assumption, we cannot rely on the accuracy of the "radiocarbon" dates for any of these earlier catastrophic events.

So, simply put, we must reevaluate the dating of ALL ruins and catastrophes in light of this new discovery -- and in light of Hyperdimensional Physics. Because inherent in the HD model is the notion that there are no true "physical constants." As we approach and recede from the "resonance crisis" points in the precessional cycle, the "constants" of the physical world constantly shift -- in an approximate sine wave pattern. Minutely at first, but then noticeably, the "constants measured over even a few years will show measurable shifts -- including the most "inviolate" constant of all, the speed of light.

This 30-year discrepancy in the natural radioactive decay rates is therefore attributed not to the use of a Patterson Machine -- this merely proved that technological change of the same rates was possible -- but rather to the accelerating space-time effects of the Hyper-Physics itself.

There is other evidence. In the last 20 years, after apparently remaining stable for millennia, the rate of the Earth's rotation has begun to slow. More than 20 seconds have been added to atomic clocks in that space of time in order to keep them synchronized with the Earth's actual rotation. And the number of corrections necessary is increasing.

The current solar cycle (Cycle 23) is the most active on record, with sunspot counts (centered preferentially near 19.5) at all time highs as we approach the peak, sometime later this year. Excessive solar storms and flares have been bombarding us at never before recorded strengths. If this trend continues, we expect the next cycle (Cycle 24 -- peaking in 2011) to be even more violent and disruptive. On the other hand, the HD model predicts that this furious solar activity might not continue as it has, that this is "the storm before the lull."

A similar (though still unexplained) hiatus in solar activity was reported soon after sunspot activity was first systematically recorded on the sun -- in the mid-1700s. It's been called "the Maunder Minimum" and created in effect a "little ice age" here on Earth. Because solar activity is critically dependent on planetary motions in the months ahead, one strong possibility is that the "Maunder Minimum" will return across the next 11 years ... leading to major new Hyperdimensional effects.

In our model, events like these will continue and accelerate. Since the Earth is not an island, but a part of a connected system, a true "Solar System," it is being effected by the angular momentum of the other bodies as we close in on this "resonance crisis point."

What is needed now is to recalibrate the dating of these past catastrophes using Hyperdimensional models. That would hopefully give us an accurate picture of just how close we might be to a new "rollover."

As for the second question, whether the Egyptians understood the tenants of  Hyperdimensional Physics, again, the answer is encoded in the Great Pyramid itself. 

The Northern pointing shaft in the "Queen's chamber," which points to the "meaningless" star Beta Ursa Minor, tells us the secret. It is not the star that is important here, but rather the angle of the shaft itself. This shaft draws a straight line through the heavens at an angle of 39.

Remember, the same 19.5 x 2 formula used in the sighting of our nations capitol?

So if the Egyptians understood the importance of Hyperdimensional Physics, which they evidently did, and if there is evidence to conclude that we are near a resonance crisis point in the precessional cycle, which there is, what does this have to do with Sirius and the celebrations at Times Square and on the Mall in Washington? Not to mention the "cancelled" capstone ceremony at Giza and a highly contentious presidential election in the fall of 2000?

What indeed....

Click Here for Part IV

| Back to Home Page |