More Support for An "Undeclared Global Weather War?" -- Updated

More than a million people (according to CNN) have now been forced to flee New Orleans.

They form the largest mass migration in American history: familes wrenched apart and sent to widely separated States; seniors forced to start over from literally nothing; children banished to start classes in strange cities and unfamiliar schools all across the Country ... some as far away as Alaska!

The dead who've been left behind in New Orleans now number in the "low hundreds."

But that toll will inevitably rise: as more and more houses, currently still under water, are entered by the recovery teams; as the attics turned-into-last-minute tombs are finally broken open; as those last moments of horror are tragically exposed ... for all who didn't make it.


At the moment the myriad commentators, the scores of network anchors, the faceless government officials -- and, certainly, the millions of ordinary Amercians watching this catastrophe play out on television -- are viewing this still unfolding tragedy as the "greatest natural disaster in American history."

But -- what if it was not?

What if, as we have asked before, "Katrina" was not a just "an incredibly destructive, natural storm ...?"

* * *

To try to answer this essential question, I began this "Captain's Blog" entry with a little known but incredibly important statement -- from a MAJOR figure in American politics, an individual with both "the clearances" and the senior position in the Executive Branch of the U.S. Federal government to KNOW ... former Secretary of Defence, William Cohen.

Almost no one, even now, is aware of Secretary Cohen's remarkably revealing testimony re "eco-terrorism" in 1997, reproduced at the beginning of this entry. Still fewer seem to realize -- even after they've actually read his statement -- the staggering technological and political implications behind what this Republican Clinton Administration Defense Secretary stunningly revealed--

Regarding the current existence of this "god-like" technology ... a technology which can actually, as Cohen testified, "alter the climate ... set off earthquakes [and] volcanoes remotely ... through the use of electromagnetic waves ..."

Flash forward to 2005 -- and the quiet introduction this Spring (in both houses of Congress) of a bill to officially institutionalize within the United States Government precisely such major "weather modification" ... under the Secretary of the Department of Commerce -- and, by October 1, 2005!

A Bill entitled:

"Weather Modification Research and Technology Transfer Authorization Act of 2005."

Its purpose ...?

Here's a direct quote from the Senate version of Bill S. 517:

SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

It is the purpose of this Act to develop and implement a comprehensive and coordinated national weather modification policy and a national cooperative Federal and State program of weather modification research and development [emphasis added] ....

Thus, as we watch Katrina's havoc still unfold ... and have watched the equally anomalous East Coast "slow-motion disaster" of Ophelia (which made its peculiar "landfall" at ~33 degrees) ... one cannot help but wonder if we are indeed "under attack!"

And, if so, by precisely what technology ... and by whom?

Secretary Cohen himself firmly removed one of the critics' major efforts to dismiss the importance of both recent "weather modification" bills: the claim that the establishment of a Government "office of weather modification" in October will only be exploring "small R&D efforts at rainmaking" -- and, utilizing obsolete "cloud-seeding technology" pioneered in the 1950's at that.

Not so!

To quote the Secretary again:

"... whereby [terrorists can] alter the climate ... set off earthquakes [and] volcanoes remotely ... through the use of electromagnetic waves [emphasis added] ..."

Even if mainstream media and other opinion makers in the Country totally ignored the Secretary's striking statement, one scientist who did NOT -- because he's been researching these precise technologies for over 30 years -- was physicist, Lt. Col. Tom Bearden (US Army, Ret).

Bearden "wrote the book" (literally), not only on the arcane physics behind this essentially unknown technology -- but on the "weaponization" of that technology by certain foreign governments.

Bearden's thesis (paralleling ours) is that the laws of physics, as presented in the textbooks, are currently incomplete ... in fact, woefully inadequate. And that this "incomplete physics" masks the capability for some to have created terrible "scalar weapons" (paralleling our own independent research into what we've termed "hyperdimensional technologies") -- based on certain nations and "black-ops" organizations having access to this currently-concealed physics ... weapons capable of literally altering the fundamental geological and climatological dynamics of the Earth itself!

On his website, Bearden presents an elegant case for these current "white world" shortcomings in fundamental physics theory having led to a range of extraordinary "secret super weapons."

Bearden's literal decades of previous publication on this intensely controversial subject amply confirmed Secretary Cohen's separate, thinly-veiled public warnings regarding these extraordinary technologies ... belatedly voiced in 1997.

Bearden's own blunt military analysis of the weapons applications of these still-secret "HD technologies" -- written well before Katrina -- is summarized below:

"... We are at war, whether we like it or not.

"And we are going to have strategic strikes on an unparalleled scale for us. Pearl Harbor was nothing, compared to what is coming down, once we consider the 'augmentation' and such.

"When that factor is considered, then it's a totally new ball game on replacing the [current geopolitical] power system. There isn't going to be much choice; the old one is going to be destroyed or so badly crippled that it will collapse the U.S. economy in a way we have not seen since 1929. Of course, in such a case hitting us, we will be under martial law, the works, everywhere. For one thing, it's the only way you can keep the cities from imploding from within, by the criminal element, looting, robbing, killing, etc. Simply wait and see; it's on the way ...

"In the new war, the first phase of WW III has already been completed. Hence President Bush's recognition that this is a total war, and has to be taken to the enemy no matter where he may be hiding or in what sanctuary or in what foreign nation. This is an entirely different war than anything the U.S. has ever fought in its history. And before it is over, it is going to kill more Americans than have died in all the previous wars in our history. The news media and the public have not yet recognized that awful situation and predicament. Most are already thinking that, well, we won in Afghanistan so it's just about over. Instead, it has only just begun.

"Anyway, that's a brief uptake on some of the weapon situation today. Some 10 nations or more now have [these weapons] .... I'm still working on how many have the appalling negative EMP weapons, but would estimate 6 or 7 nations have them in one stage or the other, either deployed or in at least advanced development. And in my estimation, the Yakuza [an extremely powerful Japanese secret society] will have them within three to five years if they have to build them themselves, and quicker if they can buy them from the Russians, Chinese ... or??? [emphasis added]."

Bearden's criticism of our own Government's mishandling of these extraordinary technologies also parallels our own, regarding their literal decades of intense compartmentalization -- in so-called "deep black programs":

"In the extreme, such a deep black program can even become a 'captured' program -- which is totally in the hands of the rogues and no longer reports to or is bound by the dictates of the parent government."

"They have their own agendas. And being rogue groups, they may well bring in unethical, immoral tricks: assassination, bribery, entrapment, disinformation, plausible deniability, etc. A certain percentage of a highly secret rogue group will wind up using all these things and more. It's a human characteristic, the old primate dominance game. Only now disguised and hidden under deep classification. ...

"In highly classified groups, these groups are greatly enabled to joust more widely, unethically, and immorally because it is so deeply hidden. So very deep classification evokes the growth and intensity of rogue groups. It's the old 'Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely' routine. ... Due to loose formation of rogue groups inside such programs, they may have dual or triple purposes, may not operate under very much legitimate government control at all, and may operate specifically for the purposes of the rogue group or groups that have gained control.

"The involvement of at least some rogue groups, some being 'cowboys' who operate well outside all laws and ethics, could also result in such things as assassinations, clandestine testing on individuals without their consent, etc. In short, it could account for what seems to be actually occurring [emphasis added]."

* * *

One cannot help but wonder just what Secretary Cohen's initial source of information on these extraordinary technological developments might have been.

One possibility is a far-reaching, highly controversial official Air Force Study, published just a few months before Cohen's own remarkable public revelations, titled:

"Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025"

A few quotes from the Study's Introduction places these projected technologies in a highly revealing military context:

"In 2025, US aerospace forces can 'own the weather' by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical
road map.

"A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary [emphasis added] ...."

It is highly unlikely that, even in 1996, identifiying these "emerging technologies," and "focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications," involved just "seeding some iodine crystals into a few clouds ".....

In this military context, Secretary Cohen's remarkable warning a few month later -- that these "eco-technologies" not only exist, but can even "set off earthquakes [and] volcanoes remotely ...." -- also now cannot be ignored.

If whomever "has us in their sights" does not achieve their (currently unstated -- at least in public) goals with the current level of destruction we have seen in the last few weeks, it is only a matter of time until the stakes are escalated ... and we could see deliberate triggering of "earthquakes ... [and even] volcanoes ..." per the Secretary's warning.

Already, in the wake of Katrina's devastation, we are seeing an unusual pattern of earthquake activity up and down the State of California -- with a peculiar concentration along ~33 degrees.

And, who has not heard of the unusual geothermal activity occurring beneath Yellowstone in the last few years ...?

If the type of coherent"scalar" energy discussed earlier -- drawing upon the literally infinite "hyperdimensional energy reservoir" that Bearden and I have demonstrated elsewhere -- were to be deliberately channeled into either the creation of major earthquakes--

Or, the eruption of volcanoes--

The consequences could be catastrophic -- not "merely" on a national scale -- but this time ... for the entire planet.

So, again, what did William Cohen mean, when he warned us -- back in 1997 -- that this was an existing technology ... but in the hands of "others?"

And, why is the U.S. Department of Commerce -- just one month following "the most destructive hurricane in the history of the United States" ... now opening a formal office to ultimately "control the weather?"

In the face of all we've been through ... why indeed.

Oh, and one more curiosity:

Isn't it a remarkable political "coincidence" that President Bush met with Russian President Vladimir Putin ... just two and a half weeks after Katrina (Russian for "Katherine") shattered the Gulf Coast? And -- just hours after "slow-moving Ophelia" brought almost equal devastation (for a Catagory 1 hurricane?!) to portions of North Carolina's Outer Banks ... before turning out to sea?

Don't you wonder -- aside from the publicly discussed agenda -- what the two President's really talked about ...?

Stay tuned.

-0-